The Fog by James Herbert

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Checkman

Getting older and balder
May 9, 2007
902
1,989
Idaho
I remember looking at this novel when I was a just a kid. Probably about 1977/78 so I would have been nine or ten years old. Just reading the synopsis on the back of the paperback scared me. Throw in the lurid cover art of the New American Library edition and I knew that there was no way in hell my parent's would let me read Mr. Hebert's sophomore effort.......unfortunately.

Well the decades flew by, but I never totally forgot this book. A few days ago I found a copy (the same lurid New American Library edition from 1975) at a local second hand store. I picked it up and read it in a couple days.

It was exactly what I was expecting. Imagine a gory, exploitative horror story with a little porn thrown in to spice things up and you've got The Fog. It's visceral and in your face, but it also works. There are aspects of the story that have dated badly (in particular the portrayal of homosexuals and lesbians). Some of the sexual stuff feels like James Herbert threw it in for all the teenagers that had made his first book The Rats a surprise hit, but the book grabs you and keeps you reading in spite of these weak-points. What I particularly enjoyed was the climax which felt like a Dr. Who episode. Oh granted it would be a Dr. Who episode for adults only, but it still had the same effect of pulling you in and keeping you seated until the credits rolled.

In conclusion The Fog isn't literature. It's the paperback equivalent of the old exploitation drive-in movies churned out by AIP (American International Pictures) and Hammer Film Productions in the sixties and seventies. Definitely more seventies than sixties, but you understand what I mean. Many of those old movies were enjoyable even while inducing groans and rolling eyeballs from the audience members. "The Fog" is a lot like that only on paper instead of the big screen.
 

EMARX

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2009
2,970
15,757
Herbert was an original. I recall reading this book a hundred years ago, probably one of the first of his for me. I did go on a binge of his work around that time. One of his books that doesn't get mentioned often enough is, Others. It was a real departure for him and very creepy!
 

Mr Nobody

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2008
3,306
9,050
Walsall, England
It should also be borne in mind that JH was a Catholic - or was at least raised as one - and The Fog was first printed in (from memory and I can't be bothered to Google, so it's a case of iirc) 1975, so the stuff re: gay folk is bound to seem a bit out-of-step now.
The question over whether it is literature or not...well, you can argue it either way. It's not literature if you take the view that genre fiction is inherently un-literary, but that in itself is a rather old-fashioned or even elitist view. At his best, JH could certainly turn a sentence; taken on their own some of them would give acknowledged 'greats' of literary fiction a run for their money and in terms of 'clines of literature' JH's work is generally more creative and literary than works by "serious" (i.e. non-genre, though literary fiction is a genre in and of itself) authors.
Overall, though, I'd agree that the early novels especially had more in common with the penny dreadful than another 'higher' form.
 

EMARX

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2009
2,970
15,757
I think it was his misfortune to be publishing at the same time as King, Barker and Straub to name a few. But I place him in that gang without hesitation.
 

Haunted

This is my favorite place
Mar 26, 2008
17,059
29,421
The woods are lovely dark and deep
James_Herbert_The_Fog.jpg
 

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
I was 14 or 15 when this paperback book caught my eye at the book store. It was the one with the naked folks on the cover, with their privates covered with yellow fog. Naturally, that cover forced me to buy the book! I read it in a couple of days. It was a mighty scandlous book for my young mind. I not-too-recently purchased that same book at a used bookstore with the intent to re-read it sometime. But, with 32 books in my TBR pile, don't know if I'll get round to it....
 

Checkman

Getting older and balder
May 9, 2007
902
1,989
Idaho
It should also be borne in mind that JH was a Catholic - or was at least raised as one - and The Fog was first printed in (from memory and I can't be bothered to Google, so it's a case of iirc) 1975, so the stuff re: gay folk is bound to seem a bit out-of-step now.
The question over whether it is literature or not...well, you can argue it either way. It's not literature if you take the view that genre fiction is inherently un-literary, but that in itself is a rather old-fashioned or even elitist view. At his best, JH could certainly turn a sentence; taken on their own some of them would give acknowledged 'greats' of literary fiction a run for their money and in terms of 'clines of literature' JH's work is generally more creative and literary than works by "serious" (i.e. non-genre, though literary fiction is a genre in and of itself) authors.
Overall, though, I'd agree that the early novels especially had more in common with the penny dreadful than another 'higher' form.

I didn't know he was raised as a Catholic. That does explain some details. Interesting.