Alien 5 !!!!

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Grandpa

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2014
9,724
53,642
Colorado
Okay, I really liked Alien, and Aliens is in my top 10 movies of all time.

When they came out with Alien 3, and I heard that it pretty well starts out
with Hicks and Newt DOA
, I refused to watch it, and others in my mindset who did watch it told me I'd made the right choice. Then came Alien 4, and I did watch it, and it was a tiresome exercise in grotesquery (although the swimming scenes were awesomely filmed). I haven't paid attention to the AvP movies. Just seems overdone.

I'm constantly amazed at how producers take a concept, turn it into a dishrag mopping up leftovers, and wring that sucker out until the last few rancid drippings are completely spent.
 

CriticAndProud

Not actually dead, just very inactive.
Aug 26, 2013
5,955
24,608
24
Australia
When they came out with Alien 3, and I heard that it pretty well starts out
with Hicks and Newt DOA
, I refused to watch it, and others in my mindset who did watch it told me I'd made the right choice.

That's interesting funny. Alien 3 is my favourite of the series. It's easily the darkest, and it doesn't pull any punches. I thought that
killing Hicks, Newt and Bishop (three very good characters)
was very brave, and it certainly sets the tone for the movie. The ending as superb as well.
 

blunthead

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2006
80,755
195,461
Atlanta GA
Alien was the only movie in the franchise worth watching, and it was brilliant. The primary fault with Aliens is that James Cameron, a great director, sucks as a screenwriter while his ego won't allow him to realize it. The rest of the sequels are just icky, stupid failures. I'd love to see another good Alien movie sequel (no remake, thank you very much, which could only fail since the original can't conceivably be matched, not to mention improved on).
 

Grandpa

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2014
9,724
53,642
Colorado
Alien was the only movie in the franchise worth watching, and it was brilliant. The primary fault with Aliens is that James Cameron, a great director, sucks as a screenwriter while his ego won't allow him to realize it. The rest of the sequels are just icky, stupid failures. I'd love to see another good Alien movie sequel (no remake, thank you very much, which could only fail since the original can't conceivably be matched, not to mention improved on).

I like to think (perhaps idealistically) of Terminator and Aliens as being in Camero's pre-ego-ridden days.

Whatever his talents, or not, as a screenwriter, our whole family quotes a bunch of Aliens lines to this day.
 

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
It's not going to be a re-make. It's a new story. I was disappointed with Prometheus- it had so much potential and it ruined the mystery of the aliens origins. I always thought that one of the best things about Alien was the awe inspiring mystery of what the alien was and where it came from. Loved the original Alien and thought the second one was good, too for its non-stop action. After that I don't think any of them hold up.
 

blunthead

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2006
80,755
195,461
Atlanta GA
I like to think (perhaps idealistically) of Terminator and Aliens as being in Camero's pre-ego-ridden days.

Whatever his talents, or not, as a screenwriter, our whole family quotes a bunch of Aliens lines to this day.
I agree that Terminator was a good screenplay, as was T2, though Cameron didn't write them alone. I was just very disappointed in the Aliens screenplay, as well as Titanic's. The thing is sometimes directors decide they have talent which they don't have. M Night Shyamalan decided not to deal with, pay for screenwriters and began writing, and has drawn ridicule as he's not a good screenwriter (except for The Sixth Sense).
 

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
I agree that Terminator was a good screenplay, as was T2, though Cameron didn't write them alone. I was just very disappointed in the Aliens screenplay, as well as Titanic's. The thing is sometimes directors decide they have talent which they don't have. M Night Shyamalan decided not to deal with, pay for screenwriters and began writing, and has drawn ridicule as he's not a good screenwriter (except for The Sixth Sense).
One can only rely on a twist ending scenario for so long before people become jaded with it.
 

ghost19

"Have I run too far to get home?"
Sep 25, 2011
8,926
56,578
51
Arkansas
It's not going to be a re-make. It's a new story. I was disappointed with Prometheus- it had so much potential and it ruined the mystery of the aliens origins. I always thought that one of the best things about Alien was the awe inspiring mystery of what the alien was and where it came from. Loved the original Alien and thought the second one was good, too for its non-stop action. After that I don't think any of them hold up.
I agree. I sat thru Prometheus and kept sitting, and kept sitting....it just never did take off at all. I can see where they were trying to go with the plot, but by the time the ending came around, I was just bored.
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
Alien was the only movie in the franchise worth watching, and it was brilliant. The primary fault with Aliens is that James Cameron, a great director, sucks as a screenwriter while his ego won't allow him to realize it. The rest of the sequels are just icky, stupid failures. I'd love to see another good Alien movie sequel (no remake, thank you very much, which could only fail since the original can't conceivably be matched, not to mention improved on).
...and none have captured the H.R. Giger vibes, as the first one did...
HR-Giger-designer-returning-for-Alien-prequel.jpg
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
It's not going to be a re-make. It's a new story. I was disappointed with Prometheus- it had so much potential and it ruined the mystery of the aliens origins. I always thought that one of the best things about Alien was the awe inspiring mystery of what the alien was and where it came from. Loved the original Alien and thought the second one was good, too for its non-stop action. After that I don't think any of them hold up.
....I also liked the alien concept in Battleship, though the ET's uniforms were a bit to derivative of the Halo video game look...
 

Mr Nobody

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2008
3,306
9,050
Walsall, England
One can only rely on a twist ending scenario for so long before people become jaded with it.

I know I'm not alone and I've definitely said this before, so forgive me for being boring, but I guessed the twist without even seeing The Sixth Sense...because tbh it's something I might have considered doing, then discarded as being too obvious.
But yeah, by the time he played the twist ending for the third time I was bored with his schtick, and IMO he completely lost his sh!t with The Happening and the "run from the wind!" line. (It probably happened before then, but I skipped a couple of films after Signs.)

But...Alien5 (which is how I styled the title on a long-ago script that I wrote for schizzle and giggles)...
Alien is, without doubt, the best of the lot. Aliens was a good follow-up, partially because it departed from the first to such a degree; it wasn't just more of the same. Alien3 (or 'cubed', as I sometimes call it, though no attempt to cube an alien was made until the pretty risible AvP film) disappointed me greatly when I queued to see it on release day way back when, but has grown on me since - and is actually a bit of a triumph considering Fincher didn't have anything like a proper script to work with/from; he went up a lot in my estimation when I found that out. Alien: Resurrection...I think there's a decent film trying to get out in that one. It just suffered from having to have Ripley in it. The star of the first film isn't any of the cast, it's the creature. That applies more or less to Aliens, too (though Sigourney Weaver might disagree). In the third and fourth instalments, Ripley was the star with the alien being animated scenery, and that's probably why they're a bit flat. I don't necessarily consider AvP and AvP:R as canon, but they were junk in any case and can/should be ignored.
So I think there's life in the franchise and Blomkamp should be able to draw it out...but only if he cans Ripley as a character. There's room for Sigourney Weaver, and probably Michael Biehn...but not the character of Ripley. She's rumoured to be interested, but maybe that comes with a caveat of 'only as Ripley'. If so he should walk away, because it'll be crap. It's not the franchise that's played out, it's that character.
 

Grandpa

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2014
9,724
53,642
Colorado
Alien is, without doubt, the best of the lot. Aliens was a good follow-up, partially because it departed from the first to such a degree; it wasn't just more of the same.
See, I have a doubt. I liked Aliens much better and still marvel at the movie-making involved. That fight between Ripley and the Queen at the end shows CG how it's supposed to be done.

One was a rollercoaster scare movie; one was an action movie. Our family preferred the latter, and we were invested in the characters. Even Burke (and Paul Reiser has never acted better) in his "sleaze out" way.
 

Mr Nobody

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2008
3,306
9,050
Walsall, England
See, I have a doubt. I liked Aliens much better and still marvel at the movie-making involved. That fight between Ripley and the Queen at the end shows CG how it's supposed to be done.

One was a rollercoaster scare movie; one was an action movie. Our family preferred the latter, and we were invested in the characters. Even Burke (and Paul Reiser has never acted better) in his "sleaze out" way.

Well, I knew someone would. :biggrin2:
Agree completely about the craftwork involved, and about Paul Reiser - perhaps he missed trick by not taking on more 'serious' roles. It's also arguable whether Biehn and Paxton have ever produced performances on the same level.
Re: the movie making, though...have you see the extras and 'making of' featurettes at all? I'm not sure which other versions would have them, but the Alien Quadrilogy (9 disc box-set, which is the one I own) does. If you haven't, they're worth looking up. I'm sure you'd find them interesting.