Stephen King, You Can't Be a Car guy...

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

DennisMac

New Member
Jun 26, 2014
1
6
81
Years ago, I bought a copy of CHRISTINE, and while I enjoyed the book, and the movie, I was
chagrined to see that, although the book is about a 1958 Plymouth Fury, the car pictured on the
book jacket was actually a 1957 Plymouth. Now, as a car guy, I was able to live with this error,
assuming that someone had simply misled our author, who was posed in front of the '57 model,
or that the picture was done in a hurry, with the hope that no one would notice.
I couldn't imagine that Stephen King was never made aware of this oversight, before, but now, I have new misgivings...
My book club (I'm a librarian) is just now reading FROM A BUICK 8, at my insistence, amidst a
bit of resistance from non-horror readers, who recognized your name as a horror writer. Now, you've done it again--or somebody has. This book repeatedly states that the Buick in question
is a 1954 model. Unfortunately, the blue Buick pictured on the cover is, in fact, a 1953 model.
Unlike the Plymouths, where confusion between 57s and 58s is fairly common, and only a true car
guy could spot the differences, the 53 and 54 Buicks have almost nothing in common, save the
headlight rims, both of which (years) enclose the parking lamp lens below. The 54 Buick was a brand new design, while the 53 Buick was a very slight re-design (trim differences only) of the
same body that was introduced in 1950. The engines were different--53 and 54 both had OHV V8s, Buick's first, while the 50 thru 52s had the historic inline or straight 8. Coincidentally, the straight 8 Buick was the first Buick product to be called a "Buick 8", a tern synonymous with OHV and inline engines, not V8s, and were introduced in 1931 (Buick's first 8 cyl engines, 3 of them in 1931, were all straight 8s).
What are we readers to think? Is Stephen in the dark about old cars, or is he just fooling around with us? I for one, am a bit embarrassed that he twice has written about a specific car, and then pictures a different one on the covers. Please help me to understand...
 

Bryan James

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2009
5,150
7,644
South Cackalacky
Steve never looked stranger.
images
Or cooler.
 

blunthead

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2006
80,755
195,461
Atlanta GA
Years ago, I bought a copy of CHRISTINE, and while I enjoyed the book, and the movie, I was
chagrined to see that, although the book is about a 1958 Plymouth Fury, the car pictured on the
book jacket was actually a 1957 Plymouth. Now, as a car guy, I was able to live with this error,
assuming that someone had simply misled our author, who was posed in front of the '57 model,
or that the picture was done in a hurry, with the hope that no one would notice.
I couldn't imagine that Stephen King was never made aware of this oversight, before, but now, I have new misgivings...
My book club (I'm a librarian) is just now reading FROM A BUICK 8, at my insistence, amidst a
bit of resistance from non-horror readers, who recognized your name as a horror writer. Now, you've done it again--or somebody has. This book repeatedly states that the Buick in question
is a 1954 model. Unfortunately, the blue Buick pictured on the cover is, in fact, a 1953 model.
Unlike the Plymouths, where confusion between 57s and 58s is fairly common, and only a true car
guy could spot the differences, the 53 and 54 Buicks have almost nothing in common, save the
headlight rims, both of which (years) enclose the parking lamp lens below. The 54 Buick was a brand new design, while the 53 Buick was a very slight re-design (trim differences only) of the
same body that was introduced in 1950. The engines were different--53 and 54 both had OHV V8s, Buick's first, while the 50 thru 52s had the historic inline or straight 8. Coincidentally, the straight 8 Buick was the first Buick product to be called a "Buick 8", a tern synonymous with OHV and inline engines, not V8s, and were introduced in 1931 (Buick's first 8 cyl engines, 3 of them in 1931, were all straight 8s).
What are we readers to think? Is Stephen in the dark about old cars, or is he just fooling around with us? I for one, am a bit embarrassed that he twice has written about a specific car, and then pictures a different one on the covers. Please help me to understand...
Welcome to the SKMB! Have you read From a Buick 8? If not, please don't.
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
Hi Dennis, welcome to the board. I think these car things have been addressed here, someone who remembers want to weigh in for Dennis?
...oh wait'll he gets a look at Mr. Mercedes....he'll have to crawl off in a corner and curl into the fetal position, all the while muttering "Hemmings Motor News, Hemmings Motor News"....
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Welcome.

Thoughts: first, most authors have very little say on covers. Marketing decides what will work best for their PR campaign (or what they can get most expeditiously). A cover says very little about what the author knows. Second, authors don't like litigation any more than anyone else--lawsuits are not fun for the whole family. This would be an especial concern for a well-known writer. So when an author uses an actual brand/model, they usually change things so they cannot be accused of negatively branding someone else's product. Much of the time it's just easier to make up a product. For example, did Mr. King call the cereal that caused all the trouble in Cujo FrankenBerry? No. Even though it's a twinner, why court a lawsuit from Post (or whoever makes FrankenBerry) if sales dropped dramatically? So he made up a name. (EDIT: I'm 'supposing' and positing a situation here, not working from actual knowledge of Mr. King or his reasoning. I love him from afar--lol). And speaking of making things up...Dude. It's fiction, not a documentary. Roll with it, baby, and enjoy the stories :)
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
Welcome.

Thoughts: first, most authors have very little say on covers. Marketing decides what will work best for their PR campaign (or what they can get most expeditiously). A cover says very little about what the author knows. Second, authors don't like litigation any more than anyone else--lawsuits are not fun for the whole family. This would be an especial concern for a well-known writer. So when an author uses an actual brand/model, they usually change things so they cannot be accused of negatively branding someone else's product. Much of the time it's just easier to make up a product. For example, did Mr. King call the cereal that caused all the trouble in Cujo FrankenBerry? No. Even though it's a twinner, why court a lawsuit from Post (or whoever makes FrankenBerry) if sales dropped dramatically? So he made up a name. And speaking of making things up...Dude. It's fiction, not a documentary. Roll with it, baby, and enjoy the stories :)
:clap:
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
I edited my post to make clear that I have no actual info on Mr. King--just working outta my own noggin & experience. You're the one with the inside scoop--lol.
You confirmed what I've been trying to say in other threads. Just feels nice to have someone else who knows the inside scoop (you are a published writer, too) back me up on it. :smile2: