the 11/22/63 book is based on false data.
- Thread starter lee shepherd
- Start date
-
This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
Welcome. Can you tell us about a SK book that you did enjoy?
Welcome to the Board!
Whether he definitively did or did not is a question that many people still struggle with but there does appear to be a preponderance of evidence suggesting he acted alone as well as much speculation that he did not.
Whether he definitively did or did not is a question that many people still struggle with but there does appear to be a preponderance of evidence suggesting he acted alone as well as much speculation that he did not.
Welcome! Fiction =/= non-fiction. Hope to hear more from you soon!
Welcome, anyway like others have said. At the end of the day we still don't know the real story. So, what SK do you like?
Oh but thank god the time travel part is real
...and that hammer ain't, and like type stuff
...and that hammer ain't, and like type stuffYes, over 50 books at this point.Welcome - 11/22/63 is one of my favourite books of quite a selection - is it 50 or more books he has written (Moderator )??
Once you get over your dislike, maybe try one of his other books.
Like not_nadine says "Welcome, anyway"
View attachment 11080
There is a mountain of evidence that links Oswald, and Oswald alone, to this crime. King did an excellent job in Dallas and at the end of his book in explaining how he reached that conclusion. Simply claiming his conclusion is false and derogatory to "Mr. Oswald" - the assassin, cop killer, and wife beater - without providing even a single example of why is somewhat unfair.
Welcome to the SKMB. Stick around and check things out here...you might find some things you like.
Stick around and check things out here...you might find some things you like.
Well, at least the OP has a nice car......
No more than he can prove that Oswald didn't act alone.....
...no, the "smirk" had a lot to do with a bullet in his works....and you're right-he didn't kill him all by himself...he had a 6.5 mm Mannlicher–Carcano, with a 4x scope and some rounds in it....
I'll give everybody on this Board $1000 if the OP ever posts another word.
Maybe you have spent too much time on the grassy knoll. Welcome anyway and enjoy yourself. As for me, I think Oswald was a little insignificant loser who wanted his name in the limelight. He was so pathetic I could almost bawl for the silly little after-birth.
Can I quote you on this? (oooohhh, I just did!
)