I agree, she does what she wants to do without consulting the group, she had to go. I don't think she took the fall for anyone... Interesting idea though!
The Walking Dead ***please use SPOILER tags***
- Thread starter arista
- Start date
-
This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
I agree, she does what she wants to do without consulting the group, she had to go. I don't think she took the fall for anyone... Interesting idea though!
I think Rick feels guilty for giving into Carol's wishes regarding the (y'know).
I forgot to tape Talking Dead. Was it interesting?
I forgot to tape Talking Dead. Was it interesting?
The theory re Carol proposed here appears very sound. I've come to respect this character for her strength and her gentle caring.
I think you're probably right that
And I definitely think that
As for Carol, I agree with what Rick did. IF he'd left it up to the council, they would have voted for
As angry as Tyreese was, I don't think
Carol's taking the fall for the nutso kid. The girl couldn't drag those bodies outside like that, though. Carol must have done that to cover. But why burn them? What was that to hide?
the nutso kid is the one feeding rats to the walkers. She thinks they're still people, just different. She personalizes with them, so I easily see her as being the rat queen.
her to stay. Then Rick would be stuck with somebody in the camp that he can't trust around his babies.
he'd kill her. Others would have stopped him and then HE'D be the one banished.
That's what I was thinking.
I meant WOULDN'T. Sorry. That's why somebody bigger would have done that.
That is what I have been thinking
The nutso girl reminds me a little of one of the twin brothers from the comics. I wonder if the same storyline will play out for her... Although they might change it a little for television...
Last edited:
I think no matter what there is going to be one mad red neck in Rick's future.
So the young girl sees the zombies as human enough to feed them rats, but not the two sick people she killed? Seems like as long as there was a chance to keep them isolated she would have shown them at least equal mercy, just as the zombies were up to that point kept away from everybody else.
But remember,
she thinks zombies are lucky because they get to go on without changing. Maybe she killed the people to 'save' them from pain while letting them 'live', Carol caught her, and SHE dragged the bodies out and burned them.
More I think about it, the more I am liking it, the child is feeding the dead the rats because she may actually envy them.
Would someone be kind enough to point out for me the way to the Spoiler button? Thanks!
Would someone be kind enough to point out for me the way to the Spoiler button? Thanks!
Right, but if they were stabbed in the head, they already weren't coming back. So the burning was either symbolic or, more likely, to hide something. Since fuel is so precious, I think it had to be the latter.
I don't know if there's a spoiler button, so I'm writing it out. It's the word spoiler surrounded by brackets [] and then /spoiler surrounded by brackets, with the content in between.
I believe carol did do it, I understand why she killed them but I would have stood behind ricks decision. although I thin he shold have held counsel and took a vote. course he did say it was not a democracy anymore.
Too chancy. The council might have voted differently.
I don't think we've seen the last of Carol
Or Sam. The guy with the fruit. They never did see his body. He could still be out there.
I do like this show because the 'disease' is progessing into something else. I think it was hinted that the disease might not turn all into zombies-zombie might be the final stage ..idk
yup I definitely think she will turn up again-perhaps a tougher/meaner/ or less sane version..I forgot about Sam
I think it's a double infection going on. The one that turns them into zombies, and a different one, the new virus, that just kills 'em.