Separate names with a comma.
To give the mods some vacation time, the board will be closed at 4 PM Friday, July 22 and reopen at 12:01 AM Monday, August 1st.
Discussion in 'Everything Else' started by Lily Sawyer, Aug 2, 2014.
...only if she's had boiled eggs and beer....
....I understand that. My point was, to even begin to compare her to "lost Titans"(his words), was beyond ridiculous-I know what he was trying to do, just found it silly...
Haven't seen cover article or heard her music but live 2 blocks from beach and this town is a much nicer place when it's full of tourists running around in swimwear and enjoying life.
...easy Dog, just because I don't particularly care for a cover image doesn't mean I'm suggesting censorship. I've worked in Broadcast for over 35 years, and find censoring repugnant...you don't like something about the CD or LP, don't buy or listen to it-it's that simple....the best censoring department is located between one's ears....
Not something I would particularly care to see, but I think that's kind of part of her trademark, isn't it? I don't listen to her music, know very little about her, but the year she was a judge on American Idol (yes, I do watch it ), I was pleasantly surprised by how encouraging she was and the way she went about offering constructive criticism to the contestants. I think I was expecting her to be brash and mean, and she wasn't that at all. She did say some outrageous things at times, but I was impressed with how she was with the contestants. I think she has a good heart.
I wasn't directing those comments towards you GG. Just stating my thoughts on censorship as a a whole.
DGC (Nirvana's record label) caved on that one though. Later copies have the offending baby parts blurred out.
Another brilliant marketing gimmick.
I don't even think Chuck Norris could defeat that butt.
I kinda wish my a@@ still looked that good....... not as big, but as nice.
.....There, I said it
Chuck Norris = wuss. I can still take him, even when I'm wearing a... gee--we're not going there.
Right here n now... Chuck. *cou-wussy-gh*
And you, with your angelic avatar....
As a writer and more importantly a human being, I find censorship in adult entertainment repugnant (using sexualized images of kids is a whole 'nother thing. The Nevermind cover doesn't count there--they weren't doing the sexualizing). Can't agree that condemning is censorship, though. Each person is entitled to an opinion, and also entitled to express that opinion. You can listen or not--up to you. Censorship implies using legal means to suppress intellectual properties.
On topic, though, I find her cover distasteful and boring, but effective (look at how much free publicity it's generating). It's not hurting anyone, though--if a kid can't look at a butt without being traumatized they're overprotected (lol). Just a body; we all have one. Whatever. Just my opinion.
You know what WOULD be traumatizing? Me in that outfit on the cover. Eegads, sharpei a** cheeks puddling around those heels. yikes.
Girl, you better hope beyond hope that noone on here knows how to photoshop.......
No one has permission to use my image in any a**cheek demonstration.