Why is Cujo so often mentioned in films?

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Gerald

Well-Known Member
Sep 8, 2011
2,201
7,168
The Netherlands
I don't know if others have noticed this, but out of all King's works Cujo is by far the most mentioned in films. I don't mean just films based on King, where he's mentioned or referred to as an in-joke, but he's mentioned in all sorts of films, not just horror, but sometimes comedy as well.

Unfortunately I don't have a list of all the films he's mentioned in, but I noticed it often. Most recently I noticed it in the final episode of the first season of Scream Queens, where he is mentioned along with Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees. The last two are icons of horrorfilms, but I was amazed Cujo is still so popular. Or at least Cujo must be very popular with screenwriters.

Is Cujo a particularly beloved book from King? I never get that idea: in the top 10 Rolling Stone published of favourite books voted for by readers it's not present for example. The Stand, It and The Shining are the most beloved.

I love the book myself, it's one of my favourites. King loves the movie and praises Dee Wallace's performance. The book is not one of his own favourites, he's not completely satisfied about it and thinks it could have been better.

I also don't get the feeling the movie is all that beloved in general. At least not as much as other adaptations.
Still it gets mentioned very often in other films. Did the book have more of an impact than other King books or does it hold more of a special place in the public's mind?
 

blunthead

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2006
80,755
195,461
Atlanta GA
I don't know if others have noticed this, but out of all King's works Cujo is by far the most mentioned in films. I don't mean just films based on King, where he's mentioned or referred to as an in-joke, but he's mentioned in all sorts of films, not just horror, but sometimes comedy as well.

Unfortunately I don't have a list of all the films he's mentioned in, but I noticed it often. Most recently I noticed it in the final episode of the first season of Scream Queens, where he is mentioned along with Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees. The last two are icons of horrorfilms, but I was amazed Cujo is still so popular. Or at least Cujo must be very popular with screenwriters.

Is Cujo a particularly beloved book from King? I never get that idea: in the top 10 Rolling Stone published of favourite books voted for by readers it's not present for example. The Stand, It and The Shining are the most beloved.

I love the book myself, it's one of my favourites. King loves the movie and praises Dee Wallace's performance. The book is not one of his own favourites, he's not completely satisfied about it and thinks it could have been better.

I also don't get the feeling the movie is all that beloved in general. At least not as much as other adaptations.
Still it gets mentioned very often in other films. Did the book have more of an impact than other King books or does it hold more of a special place in the public's mind?
The character Cujo is an iconic figure used to symbolize what he symbolizes in the movie, which is unstoppable natural terror. Stephen King has had the ability to create icons and iconic quotes in some of his stories ("Here's Johnny!"; twin girls standing in a hallway, saying, "Come play with us, Danny. For ever...and ever...and ever...") and Cujo is probably the most famous such iconic figure of King's.

Perhaps Cujo works with all kinds of matters of subject and genres due to the fact that he is a dog, just a diseased one, after all, as DJ reminds us; he had been a good dog. If he is supernaturally possessed, is an actual demon, or exists via some unknown mysterious source his threat would seem more alien to humanity's own essential nature. What feels more at home than a dog? This might be why Cujo is so horrifying, the betrayal of a person by his own home.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Cultural touchstone. A family pet going mad and killing/tormenting people could really happen--it got into our collective consciousness. It's become shorthand for 'mad dog', or the opposite (I've seen MANY chihuahuas named 'Cujo' :D). Carrie and Pennywise are part of our cultural lexicon, too. People who have never read either book or seen either movie know exactly what you mean if they are referenced. It's sort of cool :)
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
10465282563_87fe993d95_b.jpg
 

AnnaMarie

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2012
7,068
29,564
Other
The character Cujo is an iconic figure used to symbolize what he symbolizes in the movie, which is unstoppable natural terror. Stephen King has had the ability to create icons and iconic quotes in some of his stories ("Here's Johnny!"; twin girls standing in a hallway, saying, "Come play with us, Danny. For ever...and ever...and ever...") and Cujo is probably the most famous such iconic figure of King's.

Those quotes probably should be credited to Kubrick. With how much King hated that adaption, I don't think he wrote it.
 

Robert Gray

Well-Known Member
I don't know if others have noticed this, but out of all King's works Cujo is by far the most mentioned in films. I don't mean just films based on King, where he's mentioned or referred to as an in-joke, but he's mentioned in all sorts of films, not just horror, but sometimes comedy as well.

This is because traditionally, all dogs (which are more than bit parts) in films are loyal and good. If/when they have names which are memorable, it something like Lassie. There simply aren't a lot of dog villains. In fact, there may only be one that became part of the Zeitgeist, i.e. Cujo. The name is simple, easy to remember, and is instantly stands as an avatar for "bad dog" in the mind whether people have read the book or not. In fact, it is a positive feedback loop, with the more it is used in this context, the stronger the association becomes.
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
This is because traditionally, all dogs (which are more than bit parts) in films are loyal and good. If/when they have names which are memorable, it something like Lassie. There simply aren't a lot of dog villains. In fact, there may only be one that became part of the Zeitgeist, i.e. Cujo. The name is simple, easy to remember, and is instantly stands as an avatar for "bad dog" in the mind whether people have read the book or not. In fact, it is a positive feedback loop, with the more it is used in this context, the stronger the association becomes.
....yours and others points above are well made regarding the singularity of the movie and the integration of the title character into the popular lexicon.....there have been a handful of "evil dog" films, 99% of which were nothing but cinematic crap....the combination of a decently done film and the fact it was based on a King novel-set it well aside from the shlock......
 

blunthead

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2006
80,755
195,461
Atlanta GA
Those quotes probably should be credited to Kubrick. With how much King hated that adaption, I don't think he wrote it.
Yes, you're right. I was unclear. I didn't mean to say that Stephen King was a writer of The Shining. I was just giving examples of iconic characters and things from sK-related movies. Actually, the Here's Johnny quote should be credited to Jack Nicholson since it was an ad lib, it was not in the script.