I will find you...I thought you did very well.
So well, in fact, that I am going to steal your joke . . . and I'm afraid there is nothing you can do about it.
This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
I will find you...I thought you did very well.
So well, in fact, that I am going to steal your joke . . . and I'm afraid there is nothing you can do about it.
I will find you...
Man, this is getting weird. I understand being cautious of negative influences on kids, but I think this is going overboard. What's going to happen when we un-shrink-wrap our kids after grade 12 and send them into a world where nothing really is 'completely' banned? Going from a very controlled system to one of over-exposure to basically everything seems to be doing them a disservice, in my opinion anyway.
When I taught in a different school system (elementary, different county), the administration made the PE teacher quit playing games that were competitive where an individual or team actually won a game. They said it made some kids feel bad.What's going to happen is already happening.
One of my production employees was recently counseled by human resources for "creating a hostile work environment."
What had he done, you ask?
He asked a 34-year-old man to stop playing with his phone and do his job.
Granted, it's a different scenario, but the problem is the same.
We're creating a generation that honestly believes it should never get negative feedback of any kind, and that whatever it accomplishes is "the best it can do."
It's troubling.
...Kind of a Betty Page look-a-like....or vice-versa....
You'll poke yer eye out, Kid
Like sending lambs to the slaughter?Man, this is getting weird. I understand being cautious of negative influences on kids, but I think this is going overboard. What's going to happen when we un-shrink-wrap our kids after grade 12 and send them into a world where nothing really is 'completely' banned? Going from a very controlled system to one of over-exposure to basically everything seems to be doing them a disservice, in my opinion anyway.
...sweetie, that line about everyone being special so no one is...is pure genius!...When I taught in a different school system (elementary, different county), the administration made the PE teacher quit playing games that were competitive where an individual or team actually won a game. They said it made some kids feel bad.
Duh, and sometimes if you feel bad for losing, that makes you try harder to win the next time. About that same time, sports teams started giving trophies to everyone who participated, not just the ones who'd done something above and beyond. So now that everyone's special, no one is.
So ridiculous.
It's the truth! Let's make everyone the best! No hurt feelings, no stand-out talent, no rewarding someone for being 'better' at anything....sweetie, that line about everyone being special so no one is...is pure genius!...
I worked in the lunch program of a school during the first Power Rangers craze. In my own home, I did not allow my boys to watch that show because they imitated it and that behaviour is not allowed in my home.
At school, I cannot count the number of kids sent to the office for rough play, or the staff room for ice due to rough play, from kids imitating Power Rangers. Almost always, it was kids wearing the shirt or carrying the back pack or lunch bag that played Power Ranger. And as often as not, it was an innocent bystander needing ice.
The school in the post about the Wonder Woman lunch box bans ALL the superhero clothing and accessories. Like all vigilantes...they are violent. And they operate outside the law. No need to worry about trivial little things like "evidence".
I don't object to all superhero shows...can't actually think of any I think should be banned. All things in moderation. But I can completely understand a school not allowing it.
To me, saying superheros are violent is like saying the police are violent. Most superheroes don't commit violence to be wicked, but do so to save us mortals from further violence. Besides, what would I do with all my superhero t-shirts if I couldn't wear them at school?
But, AnnaMarie, Batman is so cool!The difference between the good guys and the bad guys is often only who they are fighting. This is timely to my point.
'Dark Knight' fan theory paints The Joker as a misunderstood hero
~~~
Police operate within the law. They require a reasonable amount if evidence before they can go searching a home, or making an arrest. Superheroes don't.
And I do not object to kids watching them. I just understand why a school would ban the stuff.
When I taught in a different school system (elementary, different county), the administration made the PE teacher quit playing games that were competitive where an individual or team actually won a game. They said it made some kids feel bad.
Duh, and sometimes if you feel bad for losing, that makes you try harder to win the next time. About that same time, sports teams started giving trophies to everyone who participated, not just the ones who'd done something above and beyond. So now that everyone's special, no one is.
So ridiculous.
But, AnnaMarie, Batman is so cool!
Meh - this is just a case of someone who doesn't understand what Political Correctness actually is. Being PC always gets a bad rap because of people that just don't understand it.
What does PC have to do with this? The letter clearly states they do not allow images of characters that solve problems using violence. And superheroes do.[/QUOTE
If you follow the logic of any of that letter then the majority of all kids characters cannot be shown. Harry Potter? Nope. Superheroes? No.
Some sports stars? Maybe as long as it isn't boxing. Or they don't foul anyone.
My point is that it is a ridiculous policy. Education is about informing children about violence. Not being stupid. So yes, I consider that a mistaken form of political correctness.