Is everyone missing the point?

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Do you believe Lee Oswald assassinated President Kennedy?

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

Tery

Say hello to my fishy buddy
Moderator
Apr 12, 2006
15,304
44,712
Bremerton, Washington, United States
it's chance that the concept of sight..eyes to make sight possible

No. It was evolution. Try doing some scientific research, okay?

Evolution of the Eye - Scientific American

Eye Evolution


How the Eye Evolved | The New York Academy of Sciences


In future, please refrain from telling others that they are wrong. Especially on topics such as these. Because, as impossible as it seems to you, they may be right and you may be wrong. A truly enlightened mind examines all the information, not just what backs up their particular theory.

Oh, and I know a great deal about Area 51. My husband worked there and I have been there. Also, my Grandfather worked at White Sands during the Roswell incident. Just FYI.
 

kay brown

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2016
77
73
67
...uh regarding sight..eyes etc..this was a conversation where I asked an individual a question about sight in relation to his belief there was no higher power...the keyword "ask".. and why is it an issue you are bringing up about area 51 and your knowledge of it? I've mentioned it once when a girl called it area 54..
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNTLGNT

kay brown

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2016
77
73
67
No. It was evolution. Try doing some scientific research, okay?

Evolution of the Eye - Scientific American

Eye Evolution


How the Eye Evolved | The New York Academy of Sciences


In future, please refrain from telling others that they are wrong. Especially on topics such as these. Because, as impossible as it seems to you, they may be right and you may be wrong. A truly enlightened mind examines all the information, not just what backs up their particular theory.

Oh, and I know a great deal about Area 51. My husband worked there and I have been there. Also, my Grandfather worked at White Sands during the Roswell incident. Just FYI.
..2nd reply to your reply..my replys are being monitored.. scroll back a few you will see the moderators counselling about basically behaving cool ..they were not just talking to me
 

Aloysius Nell

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2014
309
1,009
51
...and I apologize when I said the stupid and lazy comment earlier .. it is not that people are either it is more so that see something on tv .. on the news .. a big event .. and they believe it automatically .

Oh, the irony - when one post above you were linking to a video that would prove everything!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNTLGNT

Aloysius Nell

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2014
309
1,009
51
...well you make no sence..typical
OK, I'll explain. It is IRONIC that you look down on people who see something on TV and believe it automatically, because in the previous post you "proved" your knowledge by linking to the TV show you got it from.

A simple definition of "irony" is the pot calling the kettle black. A humorous coincidence in my analogy is that you, the pot, have probably been smoking a lot of it.
 

staropeace

Richard Bachman's love child
Nov 28, 2006
15,210
48,848
Alberta,Canada
Hola!

I don't understand a lot =D (It's part of my charm. Let's go with that one!)

kay brown has his ideas/thoughts/feelings. I don't agree with him but really. How about we stop poking him in the eye with a sharp stick?
Yes, but he really should not be telling others that they make no sense. It is not necessary to insult that way.
 

Aloysius Nell

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2014
309
1,009
51
Yes, but he really should not be telling others that they make no sense. It is not necessary to insult that way.

That didn't bother me, except the "typical" comment. As far as I know, we've never interacted; he shouldn't know my "typical" from a hole in the wall. And I'm a bit of a smart-***, both in person and online. I hope it's part of MY charm!

You're right, though. It seems a little unfair to dwell on it. Mr. Brown, you (and many others )are trying WAY too hard to make something out of nothing, but it's none of my business. Whatever floats your boat. And as we say down here, we ALL float!
 

kay brown

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2016
77
73
67
OK, I'll explain. It is IRONIC that you look down on people who see something on TV and believe it automatically, because in the previous post you "proved" your knowledge by linking to the TV show you got it from.

A simple definition of "irony" is the pot calling the kettle black. A humorous coincidence in my analogy is that you, the pot, have probably been smoking a lot of it.
...hmmm actually it wasn't a tv show ... the video link I put on here.. and I didnt put it on here to "prove my knowledge" as you put it .. I put it on here to offer credibility to the claims I have submitted...to give the people on here a view why I put forth my claims and to research it theirselves if they wanted....there is a big difference to the content in Mr Files video confession and how it came about after decades of JFK killing and the many documentaries that have be produced and played with approval on the national media .. like the ones who try to give credence to the lone nut theory and the magic bullet scenario..... as for my questioning your use of the word "irony" as being confusing .. in no where in most of the definitions does it say anything to do with the pot calling the kettle black ... but you are entitled to your opinion... I will make another comparison on here that I have made before between myself for expressing my opinions of who killed JFK being in the minority to the majority of people on here are in the majority who dont believe that .. and that is you for example can throw out a comment and cap it with an insult ie:"A humorous coincidence in my analogy is that you, the pot, have probably been smoking a lot of it." .. trashing my assertions and once again implying that I am a kook for my beliefs.. and you are applauded with "likes" where if I respond in kind... the people come out of the word work lambasting me that I am being insulting and not following proper forum protocols ... my attempt at saying "sorry" for calling people who believe that Oswald killed Kennedy... and I do not mean just that he didnt act alone .. I mean that he didnt shoot at all ..by calling them stupid and lazy ... I stand by it .. that they have not either had any real evidence put for them nor have they searched for it ..that they have a major problem wrapping their minds around the fact that their government could lie in such a big way ..even though with careful study and scrutiny that lie is easily tore apart...
reference:
i·ro·ny1
ˈīrənē/
noun
  1. the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
    "“Don't go overboard with the gratitude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
    synonyms: sarcasm, causticity, cynicism, mockery, satire, sardonicism
    "that note of irony in her voice"
    • a state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often amusing as a result.
      plural noun: ironies
      "the irony is that I thought he could help me"
      synonyms: paradox, incongruity, incongruousness
      "the irony of the situation"
    • a literary technique, originally used in Greek tragedy, by which the full significance of a character's words or actions are clear to the audience or reader although unknown to the character.
      noun: dramatic irony
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
I will say again, is there really any point in further discussion of the topic? We have seen both pro and against sides represented and it's unlikely either is going to change their minds. This is becoming an exercise in futility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNTLGNT and danie

kay brown

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2016
77
73
67
Yes, but he really should not be telling others that they make no sense. It is not necessary to insult that way.
like I said they come out of the wood work to be offended at me if I respond to someone being negative towards myself.. where as you your self "liked" Aloysius Nell and his comment .." is that you, the pot, have probably been smoking a lot of it." no indignation there I see...and as far as saying the word "typical" it seems to be .. people on here respond to my replys with comments that make no sense... like a guy made a comment on here about not believing in a higher power and I simply "asked" him about the concept of sight and how it came about .. and the human eye that it could just happen to be able to interpret and make use of that concept sight .. and that the concept of colors were threw in there to make it more beautiful .. and I simply asked if he thought it was an accident.. and in response I had a seemingly non-sensible comment attacking me with "sight being all about evolution and how dare I cram my beliefs about sight down someones throat and you ...
....yourself have made your own assertions on here like "Remember that this is a work of fiction. I do not think that Stephen was looking for truth. He was just entertaining us with fiction." which when you say something like that it really makes me wonder whether you actually even read the book or if you know that Stephen King is on record in many interviews stating his belief that he believes Oswald killed Kennedy and his multi-page afterword to his book 11/22/63 states why he believes such.. I think if he was trying to do other than impress his personal belief on Oswald on us as his reader .. he would have stated he was just trying to be entertaining... and yes you don't make to much sense to me when you make statements like that and that if you are really just all about attacking someone for the sake that they do not believe as you... I have asked people here to justify the magic bullet theory... I have asked people on here to justify how they believe a piece of sh*t rifle with a $1.50 scope that the experts could not even sight in until they places metal shims under it .. to justify with facts and reasons why they believe that.. I have put out facts that no one has countered ... like why did LBJ before JFK even was pronounced dead have the secret service scrub with buckets of soapy water and brushes the limousine as it set in the hospital parking lot totally destroying the brain and blood spatter that would have showed he was hit from the front right . .the direction of the grassy knoll ....and I get back comments using the word conspiracy theorist like they are all kooks ..like that explains it all... and jokes about smoking pot or such explains it ... so when I say ... makes no sense .. typical ... that is how it is... at least to me.. anyone on here can believe what they want .. I am responding to comments made to me .. and if this forum was not moderated I would probably sink to lower levels to .. as it is I am pointing out the hypocrisy of some on here. .. I also feel from some comments that they really do not care who shot him and basically why do I not shut up... cause I do care .. and I am responding to the person who originated this post ...that are we all missing the point ..because he asserted as I do that he does not believe the official lie. .and that is what when you look at all the inconsistencies and ...like a bullet in perfect condition setting on the stretcher next to JFK that supposedly defied the laws of physics and caused much muscle and bone damage .. that it has to be a massive cover up of the real facts by members of government that go all the way to LBJ .. to J Edgar Hoover .. to Earl Warren ... to the CIA.. the FBI .. high members of the military .. f**k it



 
  • Like
Reactions: Winter

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
like I said they come out of the wood work to be offended at me if I respond to someone being negative towards myself.. where as you your self "liked" Aloysius Nell and his comment .." is that you, the pot, have probably been smoking a lot of it." no indignation there I see...and as far as saying the word "typical" it seems to be .. people on here respond to my replys with comments that make no sense... like a guy made a comment on here about not believing in a higher power and I simply "asked" him about the concept of sight and how it came about .. and the human eye that it could just happen to be able to interpret and make use of that concept sight .. and that the concept of colors were threw in there to make it more beautiful .. and I simply asked if he thought it was an accident.. and in response I had a seemingly non-sensible comment attacking me with "sight being all about evolution and how dare I cram my beliefs about sight down someones throat and you ...
....yourself have made your own assertions on here like "Remember that this is a work of fiction. I do not think that Stephen was looking for truth. He was just entertaining us with fiction." which when you say something like that it really makes me wonder whether you actually even read the book or if you know that Stephen King is on record in many interviews stating his belief that he believes Oswald killed Kennedy and his multi-page afterword to his book 11/22/63 states why he believes such.. I think if he was trying to do other than impress his personal belief on Oswald on us as his reader .. he would have stated he was just trying to be entertaining... and yes you don't make to much sense to me when you make statements like that and that if you are really just all about attacking someone for the sake that they do not believe as you... I have asked people here to justify the magic bullet theory... I have asked people on here to justify how they believe a piece of sh*t rifle with a $1.50 scope that the experts could not even sight in until they places metal shims under it .. to justify with facts and reasons why they believe that.. I have put out facts that no one has countered ... like why did LBJ before JFK even was pronounced dead have the secret service scrub with buckets of soapy water and brushes the limousine as it set in the hospital parking lot totally destroying the brain and blood spatter that would have showed he was hit from the front right . .the direction of the grassy knoll ....and I get back comments using the word conspiracy theorist like they are all kooks ..like that explains it all... and jokes about smoking pot or such explains it ... so when I say ... makes no sense .. typical ... that is how it is... at least to me.. anyone on here can believe what they want .. I am responding to comments made to me .. and if this forum was not moderated I would probably sink to lower levels to .. as it is I am pointing out the hypocrisy of some on here. .. I also feel from some comments that they really do not care who shot him and basically why do I not shut up... cause I do care .. and I am responding to the person who originated this post ...that are we all missing the point ..because he asserted as I do that he does not believe the official lie. .and that is what when you look at all the inconsistencies and ...like a bullet in perfect condition setting on the stretcher next to JFK that supposedly defied the laws of physics and caused much muscle and bone damage .. that it has to be a massive cover up of the real facts by members of government that go all the way to LBJ .. to J Edgar Hoover .. to Earl Warren ... to the CIA.. the FBI .. high members of the military .. f**k it
You're putting a whole lot more stock into what is meant by "likes" than the way they're used here. Many members use a like just to acknowledge that they've read a post or to acknowledge someone's point of view. It does not necessarily signify an agreement with it that in and of itself signifies disagreement with someone else's.

We get it, you don't believe that Oswald did it but the "tone" that is coming across whether intended or not when you "inform" people about your point of view and reasons for believing he didn't do it are what's causing the rankling from other members. Those who don't believe there was a conspiracy and/or other shooters have just as much right to believe the evidence that has been provided thus far and to not believe the "evidence" that you've provided that in your mind proves there was a conspiracy and Oswald wasn't the only (or the) shooter. They really don't need someone repeatedly telling them they are wrong anymore than you want to be told that you are and that if only they would take a minute to read/watch it, then they will change their mind and see the light.
 
Last edited: