Stephen King Revisited

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Rrty

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2007
1,394
4,588

Bev, this was a great essay. Let me highlight one specific statement you made that I had never read before.

I remember that King used this book as leverage to get out of his contract, but I never knew about the holding of royalties. I have to request, can you explain this more to me, or give me a link that talks about this? And did King himself confirm this? Because I have to say, it makes absolutely no sense. Why would someone agree to $50,000 per year and have the rest of the sum invested. Who did the investing? Were their fees taken out of King's royalties to pay for those investments? Why would anyone care about the taxes? This is really odd; I can't even believe it was legal to do. Thanks.
 

Bev Vincent

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,351
11,651
Texas
www.bevvincent.com
The boilerplate contract from Doubleday established something called an Author Investment Plan. I don't know the specifics, but it would be pre-tax earnings that were invested on the author's behalf, so he wouldn't have to pay taxes on the whole advance + royalties in one year, potentially putting him in a higher tax bracket. To someone earning less than $10K a year, $50K a year probably sounded like a bonanza, and it was a way of deferring and possibly decreasing taxes on the total amount. It was probably something like a 401k.
 

Neesy

#1 fan (Annie Wilkes cousin) 1st cousin Mom's side
May 24, 2012
61,289
239,271
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada