Good Movie, But

Discussion in 'The Shawshank Redemption' started by Sergei, Nov 13, 2013.

  1. Grandpa
    Offline

    Grandpa Well-Known Member

    Honestly, while Tim Robbins is a big guy, I never once though, "He should be smaller to be able to do that stuff."

    Just for me: When a story doesn't have my complete attention, that's when my mind can wander into I'm Not Buying That Part land. The first four times I saw Star Wars in 1977, not that it made an impact, was a great example of glaring story blemishes and silliness being subsumed by the enjoyment of the tale.

    Shawshank, the same thing. I snapped at the offering, hook, line, and sinker, and got reeled in, gasping at the end, going, "Okay, that was worth it."



    In reading about the movie, if one believes Wikipedia, Rob Reiner had wanted to direct the movie, casting Tom Cruise as Andy and Harrison Ford as Red. Mr. Cruise has the short and wiry build that could more easily fit through a prison tunnel and sewer, but I am doggoned glad that the movie didn't go that route.
    blunthead and Neesy like this.
  2. Bryan James
    Offline

    Bryan James Well-Known Member

    I look forward to not-watching the eventual and unnecessary remake.
    blunthead, Neesy and Grandpa like this.
  3. Lord Tyrion
    Online

    Lord Tyrion Well-Known Member

    I disagree. Andy being able to
    escape like he did was improbable. I always wondered how he would have reacted if sewage pipe had been barred off at the stream and how he knew it was completely open. lol But I don't think nit picking too much is good for watching fiction.

    The only thing that bugged me, was all the sewage coming out of the pipe when Andy cracked it open. There would not have been enough sewage and pressure for the sewage to spill out like that.

    This film is one of my favorite films. I'm glad I saw it in the theater when it came out. Every time it's on cable, I tend to watch it.
    Neesy and blunthead like this.

Share This Page

A Good Marriage