Head and Foot

Discussion in 'Misery' started by Neil W, Jan 29, 2014.

  1. Neil W

    Neil W Well-Known Member

    Two things about this excellent movie:

    One, given the extent to which the book takes place in Paul's head - nearly unfilmable - the adaptation did very well to capture the book's essence so strongly.

    Two, I can understand why they took the line they did with the foot, but I preferred what happened in the book! :D
    kingricefan, mcpon14, Riot87 and 8 others like this.

    GNTLGNT Why Chew Through The Restraints?

  3. Riot87

    Riot87 I has Pyrokinesis

    I agree with the foot part that always got on my nerves that they changed it.
    kingricefan, Neesy, FlakeNoir and 3 others like this.
  4. blunthead

    blunthead Well-Known Member

    In William Goldman's book Which Lie Did I Tell?, Goldman, the screenwriter for Misery, fought tooth and nail to include in the movie the exact book-version of the hobbling sequence (exclaiming something to the effect that the writing was the greatest thing he'd ever read in his life). But later states that director Rob Reiner and the producers were correct in their decision not to put it on the screen that way; that they were were right in feeling it would've been too much for an average audience.
  5. mayday10

    mayday10 Member

    kingricefan likes this.
  6. Good job with it. That scene makes me cringe from pain every time.
    kingricefan likes this.
  7. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Well-Known Member

    I agree. It was so visceral. It reminded me of the scene in the first Saw movie where the guy had to saw off his own ankle and when the Jackass crew had to give themselves papercuts with the sharp-edged flaps of manila envelopes.
    kingricefan likes this.
  8. kingricefan

    kingricefan All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.

    The scene in the movie induces the terror it's supposed to. I think if they had done it the way it's done in the book it would have become the ultimate gross-out. I think the execs at Castle Rock were correct in their thinking- the audience (at that time) wouldn't have been able to handle it.
    mcpon14 likes this.
  9. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Well-Known Member

    I agree. I think it is to get a wider audience because the market for that kind of violence is too narrow.
    kingricefan likes this.

Share This Page