How well do you know the Stephen King cameos?

[Moderator]

I'd say it's a conversation to take to another thread if it's going to start an off-topic debate which could end up in Hot Topics.

 

[Out of Order]

There's no picture of Jordy V. is there?

 

[kingricefan]

Naughty. Smoking in bed...........

Oh, he's smoking alright, smokin' HOT!

 

[kingricefan]

There's no picture of Jordy V. is there?

It's the 'G' one.

 

[DiO'Bolic]

It's the 'G' one.

Didn't put Jordy V in the mix as it wasn't a cameo appearance. 'G' is from something else... unless of course I got it completely wrong.

 

[Kurben]

Don't know anyone!!! I'm humiliated. OK feel free to throw the first stone.... Just remember that you shall be without sin.... Am i safe?

 

[kingricefan]

Don't know anyone!!! I'm humiliated. OK feel free to throw the first stone.... Just remember that you shall be without sin.... Am i safe?

Safe for now but you'd better get to studying.

 

[Kurben]

Safe for now but you'd better get to studying.

I'm good with the books but the movies... I've always been bad at remembering cameos. The only ones i remember some of are Hitchcocks.

 

[DiO'Bolic]

Don't know anyone!!! I'm humiliated. OK feel free to throw the first stone.... Just remember that you shall be without sin.... Am i safe?

Oh it doesn't hurt much. I should know LOL.

 

[Kurben]

I was just thinking... Where are the answers??!!!!

 

[GNTLGNT]

If the government has their way, those are going to be illegal if they're made from ivory and don't have a decades-long provenance.

John

...for the sake of the elephants I hope that's the case....

 

[DiO'Bolic]

I was just thinking... Where are the answers??!!!!

I am only confident on six. We might need Ms Mod to provide us with the answer key.

 

[GNTLGNT]

Why do you say "Good"? The "logic" behind this regulation is to protect the elephants, but the objects, such as the pictured cameo and even chess sets, have been in existence for decades if not centuries and are owned by common people who are no longer allowed to own or sell them, if I read the regulation properly. This is good?

(Ps, Ms Mod. I'm sorry about changing the actual topic of this thread. Feel free to delete or move my comments if you think they are inappropriate.)

John

...well John , I and OoO were responding to the fact that elephants would be somewhat less likely to be killed by the scumsack poachers for their ivory, that's all....since you didn't post a link to the actual regulation-then dial back the snark....

 

[jchanic]

I tried to find the link again and can't. My bad.

<Edit> U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service - International Affairs

John

 

[GNTLGNT]

...seems as if personal possession is OK...

 

[jchanic]

...seems as if personal possession is OK...

As long as the seller can demonstrate that the object was obtained prior to January 18, 1990.

John

 

[kingricefan]

Guess I'll have to return those tusks I got up on my wall that I bought last week....
I need some chocolate....

 

[Dana Jean]

Didn't put Jordy V in the mix as it wasn't a cameo appearance. 'G' is from something else... unless of course I got it completely wrong.

G is

Spoiler: spoiler

Rose Red

 

[DiO'Bolic]

G is

Spoiler: spoiler

Rose Red

Yup, that's one of the six I knew. Now the tougher question... Was it Plain, Pepperoni, Mushrooms or Extra Cheese?

 

[Out of Order]

Didn't put Jordy V in the mix as it wasn't a cameo appearance. 'G' is from something else... unless of course I got it completely wrong.

Now I understand why no JV. Sorry for being a dummy.