Jury Duty

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

cat in a bag

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2010
12,038
67,827
wyoming
I agree with the necessity for an alternate - or sometimes, more than one - but that always seemed a bit frustrating.


Right. No one knows if a jury is going to take 15 minutes or 15 hours. So the judge tells everyone to leave their phone numbers with the clerk and, if the defendant is in custody (something that the jury isn't supposed to know), has the sheriff take the defendant back to jail. So when the jury verdict is reached, they have to get all thoe people back together.


I'd wager that the psychopath was already in jail. He would've come to court dressed in street clothes, but the theory is that the jury knows he's already in jail, that will be a prejudicial factor against him.


Aren't jury instructions fun? (Hint for everyone else: No.)


They don't all do that, and I sure wish they would. It helps give the jurors comfort and closure after performing such an important function. It happens more in rural areas than urban areas. But it should happen anyway. C'mon, judges, are you trying to maximize the hours on your salary? Talk to them.


Perfect sense, and thank you again.
The alternate thing makes sense in case someone has an emergency or whatever, and cannot finish, but yes. Frustrating in that I felt that her voice should have also counted in the deliberations and verdict. She sat there and listened to it all, too.

We did not know, until after, when the Judge talked with us. But he was not in jail, had been out on bond. After the verdict was read, we were officially released from service, and he told us if we wanted to wait for him to talk to us, he would be back in a few minutes. We went to the jury room, and the defense asked that he be allowed to stay out on bond until his sentencing, which the judge denied. So he was taken into custody then. But we did not see any of that, the judge told us when he came back to the jury room.

The jury instructions definitely took some walking through. All the legal speak. We did request the legal definitions of "intentionally" and "knowingly", but did not get any help. The judge told us after it was because legally they mean the same as in your general knowledge and use of the words and that was why we did not get the definitions. And that is what we thought, when we decided to ask, but we wanted to make sure.
 

Lily Sawyer

B-ReadAndWed
Jun 27, 2009
6,625
15,016
South Carolina
I was summoned three times in six years for possible jury duty in D.C. (was never chosen), and three times in 16 years in L.A. (not chosen for two trials and was seated on a jury the day before the case was settled out of court).

I'm clearly cursed. I'm not one of those people who live to serve on a jury, especially if it's a salacious murder trial. I'll do it if I'm chosen, but jury duty does not interest me in the least.
 

Out of Order

Sign of the Times
Feb 9, 2011
29,007
162,154
New Hampster
I was summoned three times in six years for possible jury duty in D.C. (was never chosen), and three times in 16 years in L.A. (not chosen for two trials and was seated on a jury the day before the case was settled out of court).

I'm clearly cursed. I'm not one of those people who live to serve on a jury, especially if it's a salacious murder trial. I'll do it if I'm chosen, but jury duty does not interest me in the least.

Would you serve if you got free Titans(people) tickets?
 

Grandpa

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2014
9,724
53,642
Colorado
I was summoned three times in six years for possible jury duty in D.C. (was never chosen), and three times in 16 years in L.A. (not chosen for two trials and was seated on a jury the day before the case was settled out of court).

I'm clearly cursed. I'm not one of those people who live to serve on a jury, especially if it's a salacious murder trial. I'll do it if I'm chosen, but jury duty does not interest me in the least.

Keep in mind that there's a very good chance that cases will settle before a jury panel gets to the courtroom. And a very good chance that a minority of the potential panel gets called to the box for questioning. And a pretty good chance that the majority of those who are called to the box will get excused.

Salacious murder trials are good... but then what if it's a close call? Are you finding justice for the victim and family? Are you laying guilt on someone who maybe isn't? Or if you have a doubt, are you letting a murderer go? It's just not an easy job. I was juror once (even got elected foreman) on a case that was so unremarkable that I don't even remember the charges. At least for me, I was happy that the consequences of our decision weren't going to be huge in the long run.