Stephen King has committed plagiarism

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
Can someone tell me what post #99 says? I have that user on ignore............

:p
...sorry, can't hear you....mah hearing horn done is plugged...
ear-horn.jpg
 

EMARX

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2009
2,970
15,757
There is something strange about the vitriol that ensues in the King vs Koontz debate. There are no real similarities in their works, other than the supernatural, and yet the venom spewed is incredible. Even when it is tongue n' cheek it has an edge. There is no King vs Barker or King vs Straub. Now if there was a King vs Patterson....let's not even go there.
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
There is something strange about the vitriol that ensues in the King vs Koontz debate. There are no real similarities in their works, other than the supernatural, and yet the venom spewed is incredible. Even when it is tongue n' cheek it has an edge. There is no King vs Barker or King vs Straub. Now if there was a King vs Patterson....let's not even go there.
...I've never understood it, unless the view is one is the Yin to the others Yang....and that just sounds dirty right there...
 

TurboSitter

New Member
May 24, 2014
2
18
47
King and Koontz can be hit or miss at times, just like anyone. Koontz seems to miss more often with me, but that's really down to preference. I really enjoy Stephen's prose, and that for me can save a book with a weaker narrative. (Not that there are many I consider weak, but there it is)
That being said, there are a few Koontz books in my library I would place in my top 20 favorite books list, right along with King. I don't consider the Koontz titles a guilty pleasure, nor do I admit this with a sheepish expression on my face. I consider those titles to be solid and skillfully written pieces of popular fiction.
When he chooses to get down, Koontz can really cook.
But between you and me and the old oak tree, I prefer the spices in King's cupboard a little more.
;)

ps
watchers4lyfe suckaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaz
 

Neesy

#1 fan (Annie Wilkes cousin) 1st cousin Mom's side
May 24, 2012
61,289
239,271
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
This may be a good time to remind folks that they can

a) have differing opinions without making things personal,
b) agree to disagree and move on, or
c) make use of the Ignore option
I have found this "Ignore" option quite useful lately - I used to go "like" everything just to keep track of what I had read and then I realized (especially in the Politics and Religion areas) I can save myself a lot of hassle by just not reading that cr@p!
 

doowopgirl

very avid fan
Aug 7, 2009
6,946
25,119
65
dublin ireland
King and Koontz can be hit or miss at times, just like anyone. Koontz seems to miss more often with me, but that's really down to preference. I really enjoy Stephen's prose, and that for me can save a book with a weaker narrative. (Not that there are many I consider weak, but there it is)
That being said, there are a few Koontz books in my library I would place in my top 20 favorite books list, right along with King. I don't consider the Koontz titles a guilty pleasure, nor do I admit this with a sheepish expression on my face. I consider those titles to be solid and skillfully written pieces of popular fiction.
When he chooses to get down, Koontz can really cook.
But between you and me and the old oak tree, I prefer the spices in King's cupboard a little more.
;)

ps
watchers4lyfe suckaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaz
Welcome. I must agree about Koontz. Some of his books are great. Like Lightning. A lot of them are okish. Some suck. I find his characters are a bit one dimensional. Either all good or all bad. Give me SK any day.
 

psj77

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2006
1,768
132
46
East Ridge, Tn.
Just finished the book. Something's were predictable and some were surprising. Can't wait for part 2.

I no longer believe this to be a Bauchman book but rather a Bauchman/King collaboration.

How did this go from being about Mr. Mercedes to being a King/Koontz fight?

I like Koontz personlly but love King. My first Novel was Lightening. I loved the new Odd Thomas movie.

 

blunthead

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2006
80,755
195,461
Atlanta GA
There is something strange about the vitriol that ensues in the King vs Koontz debate. There are no real similarities in their works, other than the supernatural, and yet the venom spewed is incredible. Even when it is tongue n' cheek it has an edge. There is no King vs Barker or King vs Straub. Now if there was a King vs Patterson....let's not even go there.
I think fans can't handle both of them having last names starting with "K", or at least the same letter.