Why is it so hard . . .

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

AchtungBaby

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2011
3,856
15,540
You gotta remember what was done with Delores Claiborne- that entire book is nothing but a woman sitting in an office in the police station and talking for hours. I think they did an excellent job with the film (of course the screenplay was written by none other than the great William Goldman, who added a storyline about Selena).
If a film version of Revival turned out like Dolores Claiborne at all, I'd be happy. I'm just cynical, by default, when it comes to SK movie adaptions.

I keep thinking about the ending of Revival being put on film, and I keep cringing. It would be so easy to mess that up.
 

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
If a film version of Revival turned out like Dolores Claiborne at all, I'd be happy. I'm just cynical, by default, when it comes to SK movie adaptions.

I keep thinking about the ending of Revival being put on film, and I keep cringing. It would be so easy to mess that up.
As long as they don't get Ray Harryhausen to do the special effects......;;D
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
Those stories are too big and too expensive to produce well. Bottom line. Mr. King's books never have translated well to film, with a few notable exceptions, because so much goes on in the minds of the characters. There is external, visible action, of course, but a LOT of the stories in each book are day to day life of normal people... or abnormal people, but doing normal things :) Great to read, because we get inside their heads and 'see' the thoughts going on while they go about their mundane lives, but not good for a visual medium. When many filmmakers try to pump up the visual action in the books, it comes off as hokey precisely because a lot of the terror (or sorrow, or humor) comes from what the characters are thinking.

Revival wasn't one of my favorites (though I wouldn't write it off, as I've only read it once), but I do think it will be much easier to film than The Stand would be, and much less expensive. I cringe at the thought of that ending, though. If it stays as-is, I fear there will be a lot of unintended laughter in theaters. I do NOT think the things at the end will translate as fearsome on the big screen.
...let Tim Burton handle the ending....
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
87,651
358,754
62
Cambridge, Ohio
Until... now. :biggrin2:
240_F_82105541_kAS7li6hz3SKAX3bWonqd1JP8qZEDFVn.jpg
 

muskrat

Dis-Member
Nov 8, 2010
4,518
19,564
Under your bed
Trouble is, Uncle Stevie lets any Tom, Dick, or Mick Garris make films out of his stuff. Makes for a lot of crap movies. There's maybe a handful of good King flicks out there, by serious directors who understood the material, but most of em are hacks trying to sell bad flicks on King's name alone.
 

Machine's Way

“Go then, there are other worlds than these.”
Jul 13, 2009
671
2,877
44
Baltimore
Those stories are too big and too expensive to produce well. Bottom line. Mr. King's books never have translated well to film, with a few notable exceptions, because so much goes on in the minds of the characters. There is external, visible action, of course, but a LOT of the stories in each book are day to day life of normal people... or abnormal people, but doing normal things :) Great to read, because we get inside their heads and 'see' the thoughts going on while they go about their mundane lives, but not good for a visual medium. When many filmmakers try to pump up the visual action in the books, it comes off as hokey precisely because a lot of the terror (or sorrow, or humor) comes from what the characters are thinking.

Revival wasn't one of my favorites (though I wouldn't write it off, as I've only read it once), but I do think it will be much easier to film than The Stand would be, and much less expensive. I cringe at the thought of that ending, though. If it stays as-is, I fear there will be a lot of unintended laughter in theaters. I do NOT think the things at the end will translate as fearsome on the big screen.


Perfectly said.
 

Machine's Way

“Go then, there are other worlds than these.”
Jul 13, 2009
671
2,877
44
Baltimore
Trouble is, Uncle Stevie lets any Tom, Dick, or Mick Garris make films out of his stuff. Makes for a lot of crap movies. There's maybe a handful of good King flicks out there, by serious directors who understood the material, but most of em are hacks trying to sell bad flicks on King's name alone.


Completely agree
 

Machine's Way

“Go then, there are other worlds than these.”
Jul 13, 2009
671
2,877
44
Baltimore
I think with the popularity of series of shows on the premium channels (HBO, Showtime, Starz) Like Game of thrones, Dexter, Ray Donovan ect. That if the stand was approached like this, it could be successful and have enough hours to actually cover the story. One hour episodes, with a 10-12 episode season, multiply that by like 3 seasons you got yourself some serious time to capture such an epic book on film. You get to keep it rated R if you want and these things usually attract top talent, Directors and actors. I would love to see several of Kings works adapted this way.