Ask about the next book on your TBR pile.

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Grant87

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2015
389
2,040
36
Have you started this book yet Grant87? I just downloaded it to my Kindle and have read a couple of pages. Curious as to what your impressions are since I assume you are ahead of me.
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to start it yet. Too many other things going on. I still plan to start it this week, though. I'll let you know what I think once I get going.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
I recently purchased "The Stand". The original version. For those that have read it, is it much different than the uncut, extended edition?
I much preferred the original edition. I'm probably in the minority, but I found the addition of The Kid and the longer Trashcan Man sections unnecessary--they slowed down an already puffy narrative with no good reason or payoff.
 

Goremageddon

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2015
111
612
53
Clovis, NM
I much preferred the original edition. I'm probably in the minority, but I found the addition of The Kid and the longer Trashcan Man sections unnecessary--they slowed down an already puffy narrative with no good reason or payoff.

Yeah, I'm about half way through the original version now, and it seems to flow a lot better. Although, because I've read the extended version a couple of times before, I feel like I'm reading a censored book.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Yeah, I'm about half way through the original version now, and it seems to flow a lot better. Although, because I've read the extended version a couple of times before, I feel like I'm reading a censored book.
LOL! I'm old-school (or just old). I'd read the original many, many times before the second edition came out. The original is much more cohesive, I thought, and most of the 'excised' stuff in the newer edition read to me more like 'made up out of whole cloth', not edited out from the original. The style, man. It reads like Tommyknockers-era King, not 1978 King. Just my opinion, of course.
 

muskrat

Dis-Member
Nov 8, 2010
4,518
19,564
Under your bed
LOL! I'm old-school (or just old). I'd read the original many, many times before the second edition came out. The original is much more cohesive, I thought, and most of the 'excised' stuff in the newer edition read to me more like 'made up out of whole cloth', not edited out from the original. The style, man. It reads like Tommyknockers-era King, not 1978 King. Just my opinion, of course.

You cats are higher than me! The original version of Stand better? Hmm...maybe cause I read the unedited first? I dunno. But I felt the '78 version was like Readers Digest Condensed version. Lots of good parts left out.

No cookies for EITHER of you.
 

Blake

Deleted User
Feb 18, 2013
4,191
17,479
I did. Never read any of his books(Connelly, John) noticed a book of his when I was at the Salvation Army and noticed he came from Maine. Someone said Every Dead Thing should be the first.
Actually, I don't know if he comes from Maine or lives there now, as I just looked him up on Wikipeadia and it says he was born in Dublin, Ireland.
 

Susan Hood Parker

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2015
50
188
Great thread!!!

I have several books on my TBR list:

George RR Martin- A Game of Thrones
Tabitha King- Survivor
The Divergent trilogy

.....some among many....
Want to read Tabitha King's Survivor. Replied on Game of Thrones in another thread. The Divergent trilogy I did like, not great, but good, like the world created & characters, had some holes, but much better than lots of stuff out there, even liked the movies.
 

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
I got a Larry McMurthy from my brother (hes throwing away books at the moment in a house hes emptying) and there was one by an author i've heard. The Evening Star. Is that good? Have Lonesome Dove from him and that was good but how is this one?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neesy and Spideyman

Checkman

Getting older and balder
May 9, 2007
902
1,989
Idaho
I got a Larry McMurthy from my brother (hes throwing away books at the moment in a house hes emptying) and there was one by an author i've heard. The Evening Star. Is that good? Have Lonesome Dove from him and that was good but how is this one?
It's the sequel to "Terms of Endearment" and ,like most sequels, isn't up to the same level as it's predecessor. I give it two stars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neesy and Kurben

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
It's the sequel to "Terms of Endearment" and ,like most sequels, isn't up to the same level as it's predecessor. I give it two stars.
So to read this one without reading terms of endearment wouldn't be a good idea? Or can it stand on its own?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neesy

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
I don't know if it's going to be the next book I read but it's in my soon to be read pile - what's the general consensus about finders keepers compared to Mr Mercedes? Which did people like most? I don't want to go to the finders keepers thread in case of Spoilers.
That's sort of a tough question for me. There were bits of Mr. Mercedes I liked very much, especially the opening scenes and the bits with Brady and his mother. It was very much a formula crime thriller (And I don't mean that as a knock, only to say that he followed genre norms). Finders Keepers absorbed me with it's core story...but it departs from norms, and not always in a good way. I found the Intrepid Trio (Holly, Hodges, & Jerome) to be weaker than in the first book. It is actually a stronger story than Mr. Mercedes, IMHO, but you could have left them out altogether (especially Jerome), and the story wouldn't have changed much. Just my opinion, of course :)
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA