This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
I saw one with triplets and they were all different. Same regions, but different percentages. So, where is the science failing? In what we know about Twins/Triplets DNA etc..., or the DNA test itself? Or both? These tests keep getting more and more sophisticated, so I hope they continue with some solid breakthroughs in the field.
I’ve never done any ancestry things but my father did for my mother, as there were family tales that they descended from ancient royalty. She was born in Ireland. My father hired some monks in Ireland that specialized in ancestry. I remember my father telling me one story that the Monks discovered my mother had descended from one of the worst medieval tyrants of Irish history. You can all refer to my as 'Your Lord' going forward.
I'm 32% Irish. I have a Lord, lady on my side too, through England. Baronesses, mayors, indentured servants, maybe a witchfinder, governors, lots and lots of farmers and many men of the cloth -- various religions.I’ve never done any ancestry things but my father did for my mother, as there were family tales that they descended from ancient royalty. She was born in Ireland. My father hired some monks in Ireland that specialized in ancestry. I remember my father telling me one story that the Monks discovered my mother had descended from one of the worst medieval tyrants of Irish history. You can all refer to my as 'Your Lord' going forward.
DNA is used differently in criminal cases. It's not used to identify someone's ethnicity or where they come from but rather as an excluding measure. Unless you have a twin or a triplett, DNA usually eliminates 99.99999999999999999% of the rest of the population. In a criminal case, if you have someone's DNA on the body, etc. and it matches that person, the defense is going to have a very hard explaining why their client said he/she was not with that person or around that person on the date in questions. It's very much a game changes in a criminal case. Convicting someone using DNA backs up your case very well. Science won't commit to returning DNA lab results as 100% conclusive because they want to allow that minute percentage as a fail safe in case the sample is tainted, chain of evidence is not kept consistent, etc but when you can exclude 99.99999999% of the rest of the population as a suspect, it turns a spot light on the suspect you have in question, especially if he/she is saying "I never saw that person that day" or some other alibi he/she is trying to build against the case. We never lost a case where DNA backed up our findings. The suspect was either found guilty or took a plea deal because it makes it difficult for the defense to build their case. When DNA is matched that's when you typically see a defense team switch from saying their client wasn't there, didn't do it, etc to questioning the chain of evidence or investigative procedures. The defense switches from trying to prove their client's innocence to trying to prove the police mishandled the case. If you've done your job correctly, you usually start seeing the defense and their client start asking for a plea.
My father also had something done on his side of the family, also. Nothing interesting as I recall. My paternal grandparents were both born in Slovakia. So as far as I know I'm 50% Irish (and even an Irish citizen based on their rules at the time because my mother was still an citizen of Ireland when I was born), and 50% Slovakian. Nothing interesting on that side. Mostly farmers and con men, I think
. We do have a coat of arms on that side, though. My brother got all that stuff after our parents passed away. Never much interested me.
It might interest YOUR descendants. You should get copies just to have. Someone down your dna strand will love you for it.My father also had something done on his side of the family, also. Nothing interesting as I recall. My paternal grandparents were both born in Slovakia. So as far as I know I'm 50% Irish (and even an Irish citizen based on their rules at the time because my mother was still an citizen of Ireland when I was born), and 50% Slovakian. Nothing interesting on that side. Mostly farmers and con men, I think
I know DNA for criminal cases is different than ethnicity, but it is still a person's DNA. So, if something is flawed in one application, why can't it be flawed in another?
My one daughter who lives in the midwest did call me once inquiring about it. I rehashed what I knew and told her to contact her uncle for more information. I'll let her be the keeper of the family ancestry. And no one loves me... at best they tolerate me.
No, I'm being serious here.My one daughter who lives in the midwest did call me once inquiring about it. I rehashed what I knew and told her to contact her uncle for more information. I'll let her be the keeper of the family ancestry. And no one loves me... at best they tolerate me.
No, not everyone has been tested but based on the last 20 or 30 years of DNA testing and the CODIS DNA database, Forensic scientists keep coming to the conclusion that everyone's DNA is specific to that person based on research. At some point you have to either say it's conclusive or not conclusive based on the prior history of DNA evidence. Also, the testing for criminal DNA analysis is a bit different than one would be from Ancestry.com or something like that. Again, crime labs are trying to match up someone's DNA to prove that person was in contact with someone or something, not for the background info other than to say what race the suspect is. If I remember correctly the crime lab in Arkansas ran the test twice or maybe three times to make sure the sample was consistent and it tested the same every time.
The problem with my Irish side of the family is nobody knows the truth from the tales anymore. And I don't know much of my father's side. It has all become the same. I couldn't be confident any of the stories, except for names, is the truth or not. Our name should really have been 'Blarney.'
No, I see what you are saying -- you are separating out the DNA for crime analysis from the ethnicity. But it is all the same blood.
See? These are all stories you don't just tell, you write them down. Even the Blarney ones.
Not specific to DNA, rather passing down written information. I can not begin to tell you how many photo albums I have of my parents with no information on the back. Who are these people? No family members left to ask. Strangers in B/W.
Absolutely. I know what you're saying. It honest to goodness fills me with such sorrow to not have these people here to talk to, just one more time. Let me sit you down and just let me listen to you one more time.
One thing my wife is doing at the present time... She has old 8mm films from her parents and my parents. She looked into converting them to disk so they could be played on a dvd or the computer. It is ungodly expensive to send off and get done. She did some investigation and found a good machine that allows you to convert them yourself. It was almost $400. I told her to get it. She has been working on it for a long time now, because it takes forever. Almost an hour for each little 8mm reel. It actually takes a picture of each 8mm slide. A few years ago I got her a machine that converts VHS into computer files and then onto DVD's. She did all of ours and will someday work on the rest of the family. That's got to count for something, right?
Oh absolutely. That is fantastic. But get those old handed down stories in place too.One thing my wife is doing at the present time... She has old 8mm films from her parents and my parents. She looked into converting them to disk so they could be played on a dvd or the computer. It is ungodly expensive to send off and get done. She did some investigation and found a good machine that allows you to convert them yourself. It was almost $400. I told her to get it. She has been working on it for a long time now, because it takes forever. Almost an hour for each little 8mm reel. It actually takes a picture of each 8mm slide. A few years ago I got her a machine that converts VHS into computer files and then onto DVD's. She did all of ours and will someday work on the rest of the family. That's got to count for something, right?
