- Dec 5, 2011
I agree with you, even if no one else does."I mean this in the gentlest way possible, but if you can't take that aspect of King's writing, perhaps it's best you don't read him"
I think after 40 years it's a little too late.
btw... I can take that aspect of his writing; it's just that it's a pet peeve of mine, so to speak. That's all. If an artist only invited positive reviews to his work, then where is the art? It's all good.
I'm reread King's books in order and he did it a lot in his early years. 'Salem's Lot has mention of "fags" and "homos" once every ten pages, or so it seemed.
Seems like he would have gotten more subtle about it over the years.