Watched Brides of Dracula (1960) for the first time in a long time. I found out it's also in a set from the same distributor with three other Hammer films and a documentary on bonus disc. Should have gotten that instead probably. Sometimes it's complex to find out about all the Hammer releases, because they're released in many different configurations.But Amazon charges a lot (13 euro) for returns, so I might as well keep it.
It looks beautiful on blu-ray though. It's quite grainy, which is sometimes a bit of a shame, because the grain shows up as black spots on some of the white faces of the vampires. But it's nothing you can do about, it's just the grain that's in the film it was shot on and especially on releases of older films it always quite shows up. But as a whole it's not too distracting, especially with colour films. And Hammer is known for its use of colour. There are always these parts in the background of the sets where there is a hue of a certain colour: there are blues, greens, reds, oranges and especially early on in this film a lot of purple - both in the lighting and the costumes in various shades and intensities. Today's films still do that, but they do it differently - it's more often used on an actor's face, and there is more justification for it in terms of factual light within the story, for example the light of a dashboard of a car, a flashing light on a police car or neon signs.
Since I saw most of the Hammer films on a black and white tv in my youth I always really appreciate to see them in colour.
What's nice about the Hammer films is that they take you to another time. A more innocent time in a way. The main characters are often quite nice and naive (why else would they go to Castle Dracula?). Brides of Dracula has a very sweet French schoolteacher in the lead, Marianne Danielle (played by French actress Yvonne Monlaur, who also turns up in Hammer's Terror of the Tongs). It's the kind of character who only wants to do good, like a fairytale princess, and is really shocked to find Baron Meinster (David Peel) held captive by a chain in his own castle by his own mother.
Apparently Christopher Lee was unavailable to return as Dracula in a sequel to the original 1958 hit (some sources say his agent tried to broker a salary for him that was too high), so the handsome David Peel was chosen, who makes for an excellent vampire. It also was a way to attract a younger audience.
So, in effect, it becomes a Van Helsing sequel rather than a Dracula one, with Peter Cushing returning as the vampire hunter and folklore specialist.
What you also notice about classic films like this, is that there is no sound design. In a modern film there is almost never a completely silent moment - there is always music, some sound effect or some sort of background humming noise, especially with horrorfilms that want to create as much tension as possible. In a film like this there can be minutes of silence of Peter Cushing just searching a castle. But it works so well when the action suddenly explodes, with the typical loud Hammer music that erupts when he's confronted with a vampire.
In terms of story these films don't do so much, it's mostly about the mood and the, at the time, shocking moments. It's like the idea to have blood and vampires on the screen in full colour was enough to satisfy the audience.
Since Hammer always used the same film crew, actors, sets and locations it feels like all these films take place in a shared universe. Usually the names of the towns are German sounding, although you never quite feel it's actually in Germany - it all feels too British.
One minor complaint is the time the films sometimes devote to some sort of comic relief that usually isn't very funny; maybe it was at the time as the public might have laughed at simpler things. I suppose the audiences were so shocked at the time, it was felt needed to have some laughs.
I had forgotten most about this film, including the climax which takes place in a mill. This is quite surprising as the mill climax is much more associated with Frankenstein because of the Universal film.
There are also some nice extras, including a photogallery with the many beautiful posterdesigns and a 30 minute documentary about the making which gives a good idea of the actual lay-out of the Bray studios (in Bray, Berkshire) and where each of the four stages were located and which stage was intended for which kind of scenes, as they all had particular sizes and characteristics.