1. New to the board or trying to figure out how something works here? Check out the User Guide.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hot Topics is open from 8:30 AM - 4 PM ET Mon - Fri.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. *Additional Closures:*
    Monday, February 12th
    Monday, February 19th

    The message board is closed between the hours of 4pm ET Friday and 8:30am ET Monday.
    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

Review of The Tommyknockers mini-series

Discussion in 'The Tommyknockers' started by Neil W, Feb 10, 2014.

  1. Neil W

    Neil W Well-Known Member

    Something is buried in the woods behind Bobbi's house. And, once it is partly uncovered, it starts exerting an influence on the inhabitants of the small Maine town - strange things happen, strange talents manifest themselves, people get smarter, and the outside world gets cut off. It falls to Bobbi's friend Gard to get some idea of what's happening and find a way to put a stop to it.

    With the benefit of hindsight, The Tommyknockers is something of an early run at an idea developed more fully in Under The Dome. As an avid King reader, I found my first pass at this book very difficult: I got a lot more out of it at the second attempt. And, like much of King's work, it defies attempts to adapt it effectively. But the elements which reduce the effectiveness of the adaptation are strange (and, I suspect, different for different people). For me, there were two things which really screwed things up - one was the fact that, in the book,
    what was buried in the woods was a saucer, and it was the very edge of this which got uncovered: in the miniseries what got dug up was a series of interconnected boxes.
    And the other thing was
    the physical deterioration of the townsfolk - one appreciates how difficult this would be to do on screen, but Bobbi was nearly as attractive at the end as she was at the start, and she should have been a gaunt mess.

    The ensemble cast isn't bad, and does a reasonable job of recreating most of King's characters. The main problem is that there is a distinct 2nd class/TV feel to what should have been a 1st class/movie project.
    Mr. Cranky and Neesy like this.
  2. lovely1

    lovely1 Well-Known Member

    The movie wasn't bad but it wasn't good either, I thought it was super long. I wished the acting was more believable and the special effects. I read the book, it was better than the movie but not the greatest Stephen King novel I've read either.
    Neesy likes this.
  3. Lily Sawyer

    Lily Sawyer B-dazzled

    I think this is a hard one to translate to screen. There's a lot of philosophizing that is important to the story but boring to a viewer when it's put into script form.

    I'll still defend the story, though. It's creative, the characters are interesting, and the ending is great.
    Neesy likes this.
  4. opundo

    opundo Active Member

    I have nothing against Jimmy Smits, but I thought he was miscast as Jim Gardner.
    Doc Creed likes this.
  5. MaddenSudeikis

    MaddenSudeikis Well-Known Member

    I seen it 10 years ago and read it 15 or so. I remember it was pretty darn good.
  6. Rockym

    Rockym Well-Known Member

    Loved the book and thought the movie wasn't bad, but it was a terrible adaptation.

    Changing the saucer and the whole dig kinda annoyed me as well. The whole town was never there at the same time digging, it was always just Bobbi and Gard. And then when Bobbi got hurt, it was just Gard and someone else. I also didn't like how they completely changed all the characters, in the book, Gard is drunk most of the time and never leaves Bobbi's house. In the movie, they changed him to more of a live-in boyfriend playing the hero trying to stop what was going on. And he was hardly drunk at all. And Bobbi and Peter getting "cured" at the end, was kind of disappointing as well. Bobbi didn't even get shot and get put in the shed. The shed looked kinda cheap as well. They were supposed to be suspended in green liquid, not plastic wrap.

    Too many changes for my tastes, when I watch a movie adaptation of a novel, I just want to see it come to life. I don't care that I know what happens, I still enjoy it. This could have been a much better adaptation.
  7. Pucker

    Pucker We all have it coming, kid

    I'm not even sure now that I even watched this show, but I do remember thinking this exact thing when it came out.
  8. Pucker

    Pucker We all have it coming, kid

    I had a very clear picture in my head of Gard from my reading, and I just wasn't down with Jimmy Smits in that role.

    This is what some folk around here may recognize as Molly Ringwald Syndrome.

    ; )
  9. Dana Jean

    Dana Jean Dirty Pirate Hooker Moderator

    Did not like the movie, but the book ended up being good. I ended up liking it after hating it and not finishing it when it first came out.
    osnafrank and Doc Creed like this.
  10. Rrty

    Rrty Well-Known Member

    The book is very good indeed. I think, as far as the TV adaptation is concerned, economics pretty much drove the project. In a sense, I think all of King's miniseries projects back in that time were sterile, uninteresting affairs, weren't they? There may have been value to them at the time because they were event television, but once you got through one of them, I don't think they ever satisfied, did they?

    Today, though, is different. I didn't watch Under the Dome, but even without watching it, I'm sure the production values were a lot better on that one than they were on, say, The Stand. What King really needs is an HBO or an AMC to take one of his projects.
  11. Ceefor

    Ceefor Well-Known Member

    I remember reading the book waaaaaay before I realized that a movie adaptation had been made, and I'd built up an image of what Gard looked like: Jimmy Smits wasn't it. No disrespect to the dude, but I was rather disappointed in the choice of the actor in question, even though all I'd ever seen him in was LA Law as Victor Sifuentes (and he was reasonably good in that), but nothing else. I thought he was miscast in this role.

    I was a bit startled when a lot of what I'd seen in the movie didn't match up with the book, and I'm like: "why aren't the characters 'becoming', showing them turn into the Tommyknockers?" It took me a while to realize that it might've had something to do with the budget, but then I realized that it wasn't easy to translate Stephen King's written works into something visual.

    I did like the movie, don't get me wrong, although it was okay, I felt it could've been better. The book, however, (like IT, Needful Things, and The Shining), has this amazing ability to draw me in and keep me there. The strength of Stephen's writing. The other three books that I mentioned also have this ability, especially IT.
    GNTLGNT and Doc Creed like this.
  12. Doc Creed

    Doc Creed Well-Known Member

    I always pictured Gard as a Peter Breck and Guy Williams combination. Slightly worn down by life but not as weathered as Roland. Plus, you have to use your imagination, too, because Gard was balding a bit, I think. Wasn't he in his late thirties? Anyway here are a few pics:
    327c9a8680d46bc9f9dac5d7366ee4cb.jpg GUY-WILLIAMS--2-.jpg
  13. Ceefor

    Ceefor Well-Known Member

    The first picture is really nice. :)
    GNTLGNT and Doc Creed like this.
  14. Doc Creed

    Doc Creed Well-Known Member

    I think Bobbi would've looked something like this (from the moment Gard finds the exhausted Bobbi on the porch of her farmhouse)...

    Cher in Silkwood. I could almost draw Bobbi and Gard, that's how clear an image I see in my mind.
    GNTLGNT and Ceefor like this.
  15. Ceefor

    Ceefor Well-Known Member

    That's a nice pic of her. :)
    GNTLGNT and Doc Creed like this.
  16. Doc Creed

    Doc Creed Well-Known Member

    It is very difficult to amalgamate the manifold images a reader goes through before defining a solid visual. The two former pics are a shade too handsome, but in my case these are what my mind conjured. So, in this line of thinking I'd balance out Gard with one final picture. Thinking of the wise poet, the aged sojourner.

    Mr. Cranky, GNTLGNT and Ceefor like this.
  17. Ceefor

    Ceefor Well-Known Member

    Oh, my....! :)
    GNTLGNT and Doc Creed like this.
  18. Ceefor

    Ceefor Well-Known Member

    Thing is, when I had this image of Gard, I never actually had an actor in mind.
    GNTLGNT and Doc Creed like this.
  19. Doc Creed

    Doc Creed Well-Known Member

    Me either, precisely, but, coming short of drawing the image I have in my head, these likenesses will have to do. ; )
    GNTLGNT likes this.
  20. Ceefor

    Ceefor Well-Known Member

    GNTLGNT and Doc Creed like this.

Share This Page

Sleeping Beauties - Available Now