No, I'm thoroughly HAPPY with his hand in it. Apparently it's starting to look like I'm the ONLY one.
I didn't think it was crazy that Julia jumped in to rescue someone because it seemed believable that a person might forget their injury and go with the adrenaline that surges through the body when you see a person drowning and jump in to save them. Without thinking logically and, as a person who does the work on a continual basis, I can guarantee that your first few times of doing Emergency Medical work your tendency to NOT think is so strong it's not even funny. A lay person would find it impossible to override that feeling. We have to be trained in how to respond to emergencies and even then we have to actually do it a few times before it becomes easier to do it.
The fact that she needed her stitches re-closed seemed believable too. The only unbelievable thing was that a paramedic would know how to do it. I'm a paramedic and have no idea how to re-stitch somebody closed. At least not without creating a pucker scar.
For that matter, the fact of where she was shot not being a minor incident was never mentioned but I chalked it up to last season's screenwriters not understanding how much bullets ricochet in the body when a person is shot. That started with the writers from last season though, so what can you really do with it?
Nobody in Hollywood understands how it really is, and apparently they don't believe it's worth spending the money for a real live medical consultant.
That episode is the best one I've ever seen and, incidentally, it's not obvious that the person is friends with an ax murderer. At least not to me. There are too many possibilities to know that for sure until I get more information about who did it and why.
I'm reserving judgment on it until further notice.