For what it's worth, I have not seen Wolf of Wallstreet, but didn't assume you were a pervert for watching what others view as porn. After reading your many posts here, I think it's pretty clear you are a cool cat.People who label anything with nudity or sexual situations PORN. Let me give you an example:
Cat A posts that he liked the movie Wolf Of Wallstreet. BLAM, a couple posts later somebody blasts said movie as PORN, thus, anyone reading the thread and who hasn't seen the flick will automatically assume cat A is some greasy little pervert who wants everyone to know how freaky they are. You see my dilemma here?
It's even worse when it's a book. You post that you liked, oh, let's say Ellis's AMERICAN PSYCHO (the novel, now, not that Christian Bale nonsense), and of course, somebody has to show how righteous they are by labeling the book as violent, disgusting PORN, and OH, I'd NEVER read that stuff cause I don't like violence toward women--implying that you do.
I watch a lot of R rated flicks (at forty-one, I think I'm old enough), read a lot of books that contain 'erotic situations', but I don't watch or read PORN. God, sometimes it seems like the literary and cinematic revolution of the sixties NEVER HAPPENED. Let's bring back the Hays Office, the Comics Code, let's ban Howl and Tropic of Cancer again. Let's burn our books and movies and conform to the sanitary, politically correct HIVE MENTALITY overtaking the civilized world.
Whew, rant over. Feel better all ready.
I loved American Psycho, but don't like violence toward women either. One can watch and read all kinds of stuff and not necessarily condone it. Take the Bible, for instance.
Even if you did watch and read porn, I wouldn't give a hoot. Some people are comfortable with it, some not. Those are personal choices which are none of my business.