The Stand: What would you do?

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
I never considered whether the scenario was playing out in other countries--not the flu, I know that was generously distributed by us to the far reaches of the world, but the good/evil thing. Knee-jerk reaction is that particular issue was limited to the US, but who knows? If it was country by country, would 'the white' always win? If not, that's a whole 'nother kettle of fish. Interesting!
 

Neesy

#1 fan (Annie Wilkes cousin) 1st cousin Mom's side
May 24, 2012
61,289
239,271
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
It's a bit late to chime in here, but really - it is JUST A BOOK! - it is the product of his imagination, written for enjoyment (hopefully) and is not to be taken as a text book or so seriously that we must be nit-pickers and jump on every little discrepancy or mistake.

Just enjoy it for its own sake.

There was a lady at the library once complaining about a book written for children by Robert Munsch - something about a baby being found and kept by a truck driver - I am sorry I cannot recall the title. (Edit: it was called Murmel, Murmel, Murmel)


Anyway, after she ranted to the librarian for a while I said "It's just a book".

Her reply was something like "So said the bank robber!" (or something weird similar to that).

Some people take everything literally.
 
Last edited:

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
It's a bit late to chime in here, but really - it is JUST A BOOK! - it is the product of his imagination, written for enjoyment (hopefully) and is not to be taken as a text book or so seriously that we must be nit-pickers and jump on every little discrepancy or mistake.

Just enjoy it for its own sake.

There was a lady at the library once complaining about a book written for children by Robert Munsch - something about a baby being found and kept by a truck driver - I am sorry I cannot recall the title. (Edit: it was called Murmel, Murmel, Murmel)


Anyway, after she ranted to the librarian for a while I said "It's just a book".

Her reply was something like "So said the bank robber!" (or something weird similar to that).

Some people take everything literally.
It's just a thread.....;;D
 

DiO'Bolic

Not completely obtuse
Nov 14, 2013
22,864
129,998
Poconos, PA
Actually, it is something to think about.

Isn’t science wonderful? Incubate, manipulate, mutate and assimilate. All in the name of humanity LOL.

The worst new diseases of the future will most probably be zoonotic, coming from animals and leaping to humans. They probably be viruses, which will replicate and evolve quickly, and be impervious to antibiotics. Perhaps causing a pandemic that could wipe out 99.99% of humans because it would spread too rapidly to be able to come up with a cure?

Resistance is futile?

Sleep tight, don’t let the genetically engineered bed bugs bite. :)
 

Kingfisher

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2015
55
275
32
I'm sure it's been discussed at length elsewhere many times before but Mid-World, where Roland is from, could have been an alternative world in which The Stand took place and Flagg's plans succeeded in one way or another. The evidence being that some form of cataclysmic event occured to the severity that the entire world had to start over. It's perfectly possible that in that level and time, Flagg WAS able to fire off nuclear weapons. Just think about the vast wastelands, the mutants, the technology which was lost to time under rubble and seemingly where people took shelter underground.

Then again it's all one big loop so it's fair to assume whatever you want. Flagg could have destroyed the world, someone could have risen against him and temporarily defeated him, and the world just 'moved on'. Flagg may succeed temporarily in endeavours but the White always catches up to him in the end.
 

Kingfisher

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2015
55
275
32
Books over 1000 pages scare me. I don't have that kind of patience.

Take advice if you ever do decide to read it and go for the first version. The uncut version has a lot of unnecessary stuff like when
Fran's father dies, his body is described in disgusting detail. She buries him after much work and in the original version, it was poignant and beautiful in a way. In the uncut version it is unnecessarily grotesque for little reason other than King seemed to want to be gross. It ruined an otherwise moving scene and there was a reason it was edited out in the first place.
 

SharonC

Eternal Members
Jul 9, 2007
2,958
11,254
Canada
I much preferred the uncut version. The version he intended it to be. I HATED, LOATHED the first version because it lacked something for me. I loved it when they added the stuff back in.

But, maybe I'm just crude and crass. :yes_pig:
I have the uncut version. I did have the first one but gave it to my niece when the uncut one came out. It is so much more complete!
 

Neesy

#1 fan (Annie Wilkes cousin) 1st cousin Mom's side
May 24, 2012
61,289
239,271
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I much preferred the uncut version. The version he intended it to be. I HATED, LOATHED the first version because it lacked something for me. I loved it when they added the stuff back in.

But, maybe I'm just crude and crass. :yes_pig:

I have the uncut version. I did have the first one but gave it to my niece when the uncut one came out. It is so much more complete!

I read the original one back when it first came out (the late 70s?), but now I am going to try the 'uncut' version that I picked up back in January 2013 while on vacation in Mexico!
 

Haunted

This is my favorite place
Mar 26, 2008
17,059
29,421
The woods are lovely dark and deep
Take advice if you ever do decide to read it and go for the first version. The uncut version has a lot of unnecessary stuff like when
Fran's father dies, his body is described in disgusting detail. She buries him after much work and in the original version, it was poignant and beautiful in a way. In the uncut version it is unnecessarily grotesque for little reason other than King seemed to want to be gross. It ruined an otherwise moving scene and there was a reason it was edited out in the first place.
Uncut tis awesome.