What Are You Reading?

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Status
Not open for further replies.

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
I agree. I'll definitely look up the other book you mentioned.
I can see that reasoning but she broke so many other rules on how you are supposed to behave that i wouldn't put it past her to break this one too if she felt so inclined. After all, marriage outside the royal family was not unheard of even if it was very unusual. And she wasn't the first female Pharaoh, just the first succesful one. At least one, perhaps two before her. The sources are weaker there but the one we know about was the sister of a childless pharaoh and might very well have been married (it would have been strange if she wasn't) but the sources say nothing about her marital status just that she was pharaoh. So i think it is possible according to egyptian practices having a husband and be pharaoh if the husband is not a member of the royal line. If the husband wasn't he couldn't claim to be pharaoh since a pharaoh must be of the ruling family. Pharaoh is not only a political title but also a religious one. Since Hatshepsut was daughter of a pharaoh she could claim the title. It was just unheard of for a woman to claim the title if there was even a small boy around. But she did. And got away with it.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Would that be After Alice? I'm a little hesitant about this one. So many have tried their hands at a revisionist version of Alice in Wonderland, but none have been successful in my opinion. Hopefully Mr. Maguire's attempt will be the one.
It is After Alice. He's going at the story differently: this book is about the people Alice left behind when she disappeared, then follows a character barely mentioned in the original Alice in Wonderland as that girl follows Alice down the rabbit hole. It could be interesting. It's certainly not very long: 273 pages, double spaced & larger font size. I suspect it will read more like a novella than a meaty novel. Still, I really enjoyed Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister and Mirror, Mirror (the Wicked series stated fairly well, I thought, but he dragged it out too long), so I'm willing to give this one a try :) I'll probably start it later today, and will be surprised if it takes more than a day and a half to read.
 

carrie's younger brother

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2012
5,428
25,651
NJ
It is After Alice. He's going at the story differently: this book is about the people Alice left behind when she disappeared, then follows a character barely mentioned in the original Alice in Wonderland as that girl follows Alice down the rabbit hole. It could be interesting. It's certainly not very long: 273 pages, double spaced & larger font size. I suspect it will read more like a novella than a meaty novel. Still, I really enjoyed Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister and Mirror, Mirror (the Wicked series stated fairly well, I thought, but he dragged it out too long), so I'm willing to give this one a try :) I'll probably start it later today, and will be surprised if it takes more than a day and a half to read.
Please let us know what you think. From the length of it, could this be one of his YA books?

I too really liked Confessions... and Mirror, Mirror. Being a huge Oz fan, I had read Wicked when it first was published (way before the musical) and loved it. Of the sequels, I have only read Son of a Witch (great title!) and found it not even close in quality of storytelling or writing. The only other book by him that's I've read is Lost, which just left me... well... lost.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Please let us know what you think. From the length of it, could this be one of his YA books?

I too really liked Confessions... and Mirror, Mirror. Being a huge Oz fan, I had read Wicked when it first was published (way before the musical) and loved it. Of the sequels, I have only read Son of a Witch (great title!) and found it not even close in quality of storytelling or writing. The only other book by him that's I've read is Lost, which just left me... well... lost.
Nope, unless they change the genre category pre-printing. I'm not a YA reviewer.
 

cat in a bag

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2010
12,038
67,827
wyoming
I was reading a book called Witch Island, got about halfway through it. It is kind of meh. I might go back to it. I probably would have really liked it in high school...maybe not even then, jr high...but it wasn't really calling to me to finish it so last night I started a reread of Rose Madder. :)
 
Last edited:

muskrat

Dis-Member
Nov 8, 2010
4,518
19,564
Under your bed
Still in Derry, summer of 58, thoroughly re-diggin It. What I'm diggin most is all the back stories, the side trips, the town--Mike and his Interludes. Good lord.

Would love to know more of Derry's early history, so I would. Like the first settlers, or something. Have Roland show up and shoot something, I dunno.

Good damn book.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Finishing Insurgent, then probably After Alice (Maguire's newest). It doesn't go to print until October, so the review isn't due until then, but both of my girls are champing at the bit to get to it :) I'll get it read in a hurry, for their sake.
 

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
Finishing Insurgent, then probably After Alice (Maguire's newest). It doesn't go to print until October, so the review isn't due until then, but both of my girls are champing at the bit to get to it :) I'll get it read in a hurry, for their sake.
Are you gonna read the third installment in Roths trilogy, Allegiant? It follows Divergent and Insurgent. I liked the first but thought they got a little weaker after that.
 

cat in a bag

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2010
12,038
67,827
wyoming
Finishing Insurgent, then probably After Alice (Maguire's newest). It doesn't go to print until October, so the review isn't due until then, but both of my girls are champing at the bit to get to it :) I'll get it read in a hurry, for their sake.
I have enjoyed all of Maguire's books that I have read, except for Lost, like carrie's younger brother mentioned. I have only read Wicked out of the Oz books, though. Have the rest of them, just have not gotten to them.

Did you finish that Oregon Trail book?
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
I have enjoyed all of Maguire's books that I have read, except for Lost, like carrie's younger brother mentioned. I have only read Wicked out of the Oz books, though. Have the rest of them, just have not gotten to them.

Did you finish that Oregon Trail book?
I did! It was interesting--very anecdotal, if you like that sort of thing. It made me laugh quite a few times, and think about how very hard that trip was for the original pioneers.

I haven't read the last of the Wicked books--can't even remember the name of it :/ I liked Wicked, but Son of a Witch and A Lion Among Men... not so much. I can't even remember if I finished the Lion book.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Are you gonna read the third installment in Roths trilogy, Allegiant? It follows Divergent and Insurgent. I liked the first but thought they got a little weaker after that.
Probably. I agree--Insurgent is weaker than Divergent, but I've certainly read worse YA books. Unless it falls completely apart at the end (I'm about 2/3 of the way through), I'll finish :)
 

jchanic

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2006
3,164
6,097
79
Cleveland Ohio
I've been jumping around in this one, too. I read the intros first, then the stories I've never read before. Then I read "Ur" with my Kindle open beside it to see how much he's revised it compared to the original version.

I'm reading the new stories first (I'm rationing them to one a day), then I plan on going back and read the introductions. I'm leaving Ur till last, then I'll reread the stories I already read in the original magazines.

John
 
Status
Not open for further replies.