What Are You Reading?

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grant87

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2015
389
2,040
36
Oh, yes! I fall into bad slumps once or twice a year. Typically I reread an old King favorite to get me out--his writing is so comforting to me. :) Carrie usually does the trick.
I'm currently reading Christine, but haven't picked it up in almost two weeks. I think I might need a short story collection, like Skeleton Crew, or maybe something non-horror. One of my many baseball books, perhaps.
 

danie

I am whatever you say I am.
Feb 26, 2008
9,760
60,662
60
Kentucky
I'm currently in the midst of a reading slump. Have been for a couple weeks now.

Anybody else fall into a slump occasionally? How do you break it?
When going through an especially hard time, I found I couldn't read anything. The words just wouldn't stay in my head and made no sense. I was used to reading all the time, and even using it as a form of escape, so I was really frustrated. One thing I did was try to read one page a night in the book I had started. I know that sounds like very little, but if I could get through one page and understand it, then I would close the book and try it again the next day.

Like AchtungBaby said, Mr. King is who broke me out of my slump. I had watched Misery with my son, and picked it up off my shelf. I read a couple of pages, and everything around me was gone. It felt like I was reading the novel for the first time. I (re)read Misery in two days, and then reread Gerald's Game as well. Since then, I still don't read as much as I used to, but I don't struggle with it like I had been. I hope you'll be able to break your slump soon.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Yes it sounds interesting. He tells the story in chronological order but has named the chapters after important british persons of that timeperiod. The roman period is named Boadicea, the period after the romans left Arthur (a bit questionable since no sources remotely close to the time mentions an Arthur ( i think the first to mention arthur by name is Nennius about 900 AD i think but he surely know more) but it is a popular history even if it is a scholarly intent behind so i understand why he thought he couldn't just skip Arthur). The other chapters are wellknown Anglosaxon kings, Offa for the 8,th century, Alfred for 9,th, Athelstan for the 10,th and Ethelred for the 11,th until the invasion in 1066. He finishes his story with a chapter named after The Conqueror. The only period that isnt named after a person is the period 600-ca 750 which is called The Sutton Hoo Man which is a worldknown archaological find of he biggest importance. He mentions in a foreword (the only part i read so far) that hes gonna use the sources like Gildas, Bede, Nennius and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle plus other chronicles and charters and other types of sources(among them archaeology) at their proper place.
Is Crown of Blood worth reading? I looked at it but reacted at the title which was a bit gossipy.
EXACTLY! It was the title that kept me from it so far! I'm only about a quarter of the way in, but it's decent popular history. The author makes some suppositions that I think aren't on the most solid ground, but none have been wild yet. In a way, it reminds me of Cornwell's first book about Jack the Ripper (I see that she has a second one out now): she's done study, but makes some leaps in logic that aren't the most scholarly. This one is definitely easy to read, though--a good step between good historical fiction and a deep historical text, as those are sometimes quite dry to read.
 

RichardX

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2006
1,737
4,434
"American Fire" by Monica Hesse. Bizarre non-fiction account of serial arsonist Charles Smith and his girlfriend who set numerous fires to abandoned buildings in VA a couple years ago. Smith comes off as a somewhat sympathetic character who may have been manipulated into this mess by his girlfriend. It is also an account of the declining fortunes of rural America. Anyone who wonders off the path to a rural town in America gets the sense of complete decline. Downtown areas with closed doors and former mansions in disrepair. Populations fleeing for the cities. If the rural American town is not completely dead, it certainly is in a state of decline. I think that is something that influenced the recent election and came as a shock to those who ever get out of the major cities.

Book Review: 'American Fire,' By Monica Hesse : NPR
 

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
EXACTLY! It was the title that kept me from it so far! I'm only about a quarter of the way in, but it's decent popular history. The author makes some suppositions that I think aren't on the most solid ground, but none have been wild yet. In a way, it reminds me of Cornwell's first book about Jack the Ripper (I see that she has a second one out now): she's done study, but makes some leaps in logic that aren't the most scholarly. This one is definitely easy to read, though--a good step between good historical fiction and a deep historical text, as those are sometimes quite dry to read.
Ok, but Cornwells Ripper book made a few to many assumptions on extremely shaky basis for my taste. I've started the first chapter in The Dark Ages book and so far he makes clear what are facts, what are reaonable assumptions and why and what are speculation/guesses. In cornwells book the line between these cathegories were never quite clear. The dryness you mention is a sickness that comes partly from an unability to write well and partly in an uninterest in making anyone less educated than the author understand. It is also more difficult to do that and keep the historical integrity of the book. If you havent read the historian Marc Morris and his book on Vilhelm the conqueror i can recommend it. It shows that it can be done.
 

recitador

Speed Reader
Sep 3, 2016
1,750
8,264
41
The Passage - Justin Cronin.

This is a good one. First in a trilogy. The second book is kind of slow but the third one is great (from what I hear anyway as I haven't had the time to read it yet).

same here. i've been kind of waiting for paperback cause i don't buy hardcovers that often (price and space) . . . but i feel like it's been slow going for this particular set of books. enjoyed the first two.
 

skimom2

Just moseyin' through...
Oct 9, 2013
15,683
92,168
USA
Ok, but Cornwells Ripper book made a few to many assumptions on extremely shaky basis for my taste. I've started the first chapter in The Dark Ages book and so far he makes clear what are facts, what are reaonable assumptions and why and what are speculation/guesses. In cornwells book the line between these cathegories were never quite clear. The dryness you mention is a sickness that comes partly from an unability to write well and partly in an uninterest in making anyone less educated than the author understand. It is also more difficult to do that and keep the historical integrity of the book. If you havent read the historian Marc Morris and his book on Vilhelm the conqueror i can recommend it. It shows that it can be done.
Oh, I agree. It is possible to do, but not easy. Thank you for the rec on Morris--I'm going to look that up!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.