Wish I could see the image.
This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
Wish I could see the image.
All things back to normal I see.The Nana afterglow is over. You'll have to hope I get to go down on Christmas weekend so you get another reprieve when I get back.
All things back to normal I see.
Congratulations, what an awesome job! My daughter has an algebra exam this coming Tuesday that she isn't exactly thrilled about!OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHYESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHH
Thank you.Silly people. They use algebra all the time. No, we don't sit at home and think of 2(a+b)=c equations. But the logic that goes into it, the linear method of calculation, the breaking of an issue into component parts - we do that all the time. We just don't call it x, y, z.
Silly people. They use algebra all the time. No, we don't sit at home and think of 2(a+b)=c equations. But the logic that goes into it, the linear method of calculation, the breaking of an issue into component parts - we do that all the time. We just don't call it x, y, z.
You get an A
next question related to what you said... Is there a black hole at the center of galaxies? Does it move?
Sorry, bouncetastic! Missed this.
Yes, there's a black hole in the center of the galaxy, a massive one. May likely be a black hole at the center of most galaxies, which makes sense - you have a lot of mass in galaxies that will gravitate (nyuk!) toward itself inwardly. Maybe the whole appearance of our galaxy is a huge accretion disc.
Yes, the black hole moves. Black holes have spin. And since the galaxy is moving its way through its galactic neighborhood specifically and the cosmos generally, the black hole at the center is moving along with it.
Fact!Next question... Are wormholes science fiction or fact?
Next question... Are wormholes science fiction or fact?
Well, they're certainly science fiction. But they might also be fact. They're hypothetical.
Imagine a black hole, a singularity, gobbling up matter and the gravity around it. If you use the stereotypical example of a weight on a trampoline surface, the weight is getting heavier and heavier, and the rubberized surface is dimpling deeper and deeper. Rover's chew toy, loose change, a tennis ball, even dust that is on that surface keep getting sucked down to that weight, making it heavier and dimpling yet more. It's really stretchy. It's stretched down a few hundred feet now.
And so in our weight/trampoline thought experiment, what happens is that the weight gets so heavy that a piece of that surface finally rips open near the bottom. The weight and its accretion is still weighing down the surface, so you've still got that big, deep dimple, but now some long-lost keys are sliding down, and rather than adding their mass to all that weight, they slide through the rip, out of that long dimple-tube, to the world outside.
Now, there's a lot more that actually would go on with a real wormhole, and I'm sure that astro/quantum/theoretical physicists would sneer at my description. But there you have it, best I can do.
That's theoretical. But lots of theoretical stuff, such as black holes and subatomic particles, have an interesting way of actually being proven.
I opened a can of worms when I mentioned mathematics, didn't I? Einstein and Nash are reading this thread in Heaven and having fun.
It doesn't meet the third rule set up by the International Astronomical Union. Here are the three rules they've determined are the criteria for designation as a planet:A repeat of The Big Bang Theory was on yesterday evening, the one in which Neil deGrasse Tyson was a guest star. Sheldon is angry at him for declaring Pluto is not a planet.
Why isn't Pluto considered a planet? And if Pluto isn't a planet, what is it???