Kubrick's Shining WORST novel adaptation ever!

  • New to the board or trying to figure out how something works here? Check out the User Guide.
  • The message board will be closed from Thursday, September 12th at 4pm EST until Tuesday, September 24th at 8:30 AM ET
    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

  • New 2019 Hours: The message board is closed between the hours of 4pm ET Thursday and 8:30am ET Tuesday.

    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
49,951
140,514
Maine
He did not like that Kubrick's version was, as he described it, "cold". The characters did not have any warmth and he did not feel that people could relate and sympathize with them because of that. He also did not like Kubrick's misogynist portrayal of Wendy. And he thought it was important that we should see the gradual decline of Jack (Torrance) into madness. It would take me a while to look up actual quotes but those are the highlights from what I remember him saying in recent interviews.
 

Christine62

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2013
493
3,124
57
Oklahoma City
Hey AnnaMarie--believe it or not my middle name is Marianna! If you read the Shining you find that the tortured person of Jack Torrence who really does want to be a good guy and love his family and protect his son is totally transformed into a one dimensional ******* who hates his wife and resents his son and just goes nuts.
 

doowopgirl

very avid fan
Aug 7, 2009
6,908
24,787
61
dublin ireland
He did not like that Kubrick's version was, as he described it, "cold". The characters did not have any warmth and he did not feel that people could relate and sympathize with them because of that. He also did not like Kubrick's misogynist portrayal of Wendy. And he thought it was important that we should see the gradual decline of Jack (Torrance) into madness. It would take me a while to look up actual quotes but those are the highlights from what I remember him saying in recent interviews.
I see his points. The film, taken on it's own is scary and creepy and atmospheric. IMO
 

AnnaMarie

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2012
7,067
29,548
Other
Hey AnnaMarie--believe it or not my middle name is Marianna! If you read the Shining you find that the tortured person of Jack Torrence who really does want to be a good guy and love his family and protect his son is totally transformed into a one dimensional ******* who hates his wife and resents his son and just goes nuts.
I did read the book. And I realize it's not a close adaption. But in my opinion it is not the WORST novel adaption. In fact I like it much more then the other adaption of The Shining. And I think it much better than the Running Man. That one didn't seem to share anything other then the title.
 

GNTLGNT

The idiot is IN
Jun 15, 2007
85,867
345,807
58
Cambridge, Ohio
...everyone here knows how I feel about Kubrick's version(as an adaptation I felt it was a real booger-snot)...as a movie ALONE, and IF I'd never read the book-I would have been impressed...the atmosphere is great, I feel like King though-that the cast was nothing more than wooden cut-outs....despite the malevolence of the Overlook, The Shining at it's base-like everything else King does-is CHARACTER driven, and that's where the movie lost traction...even the Garris re-working, which I found much more likeable-falls short of capturing the madness and dissolution inherent in the novel....some things are just better left to our imaginations...
 

AnnaMarie

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2012
7,067
29,548
Other
I have gotten past wanting a movie to be a duplicate of a book.

Do you ever watch the tv series Bones? In the original book, she lives in Montreal. If it's a work of fiction I'm fine with changes. (On the other hand I hate watching documentaries because they should not be the writers version. When I have any knowledge of the true story I always end up angry.
Argo is a perfect example.
)
 

SharonC

Eternal Members
Jul 9, 2007
2,958
11,253
Canada
I won't even watch Argo because from what I've read and heard it is told from one point of view and leaves out a lot of other equally important participants in the escape of the American embassy people.
Even if I hadn't read the Shining, I don't think I would have liked Kubrick's version. I did see it and just intensely disliked Wendy's and Danny's characters. Jack Nicholson was his usual over the top self. Not one of my favourite actors. I have seen other Kubrick films as well and maybe it's only me, but I never understood why the man was considered a film genius.
 

Dana Jean

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 11, 2006
50,338
218,021
Thornfield
I won't even watch Argo because from what I've read and heard it is told from one point of view and leaves out a lot of other equally important participants in the escape of the American embassy people.
Even if I hadn't read the Shining, I don't think I would have liked Kubrick's version. I did see it and just intensely disliked Wendy's and Danny's characters. Jack Nicholson was his usual over the top self. Not one of my favourite actors. I have seen other Kubrick films as well and maybe it's only me, but I never understood why the man was considered a film genius.
i'm with ya on that Kubrick stuff.
 

Sundrop

Sunny the Great & Wonderful
Jun 12, 2008
27,132
145,889
Even if I hadn't read the Shining, I don't think I would have liked Kubrick's version. I did see it and just intensely disliked Wendy's and Danny's characters. Jack Nicholson was his usual over the top self. Not one of my favourite actors. I have seen other Kubrick films as well and maybe it's only me, but I never understood why the man was considered a film genius.
Yes....exactly!
 

Angelo Bottigliero

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2013
764
3,102
Rotterdam
I just try to look at the movie as if it's not from the novel. Because it's a fantastic movie. We're just looking at it through our 'SK-eyes', that's why many fans don't like it.

I noticed I do this with photography too. I love photography, give workshops, organize weekends, have a studio. But when my mom went on holiday to some faraway jungle, and came back with beautiful pics the was very proud of, I was all 'Horizon is crooked on this one, you should have placed something in view here to create depth, this one is nice but the composition could have been better if...' :D
 

Elijah Sattler

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2013
73
389
19
TX
Actually, I do agree with you on some points. I wouldn't exactly you know be so harsh about it, but I do. By the way, Jack did read the novel, he recommended someone else play the role for Wendy, I forgot who, but it was a blonde cutie. Stanley was hell bent on Duvall to play the role and convinced Jack that she was. Anywho, I actually loved the movie. Not because of the acting necessarily (although Jack is a cool-cat daddy, you have to admit), but just because of Kubrick. I love Kubrick's movies so so so so so much, they're just so cool and weird. In conclusion, I like it because it's weird. That's my argument lol.
 

OldDarth

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2006
728
2,960
Canada
I enjoy the Kubrick movie as a movie but not as faithful translation of the book. It's an adaptation in the truest sense of the word. The movie borrows from the book but it is a totally different beast.

Weirdly, King's TV mini-series is a closer adaptation of the book but I like it less than the movie.

In both versions the major failing, are the child actors they chose to play Danny. Neither worked for me.

The definitive adaptation of The Shining has yet to be made.
 
The Institute - Coming September 10th, 2019 Enter the Stephen King Days Sweepstakes through 
			  9/30/19 for a chance to win and iPad, books, and more IT - Now Available in Trade Paperback! Flight or Fright - Now Available in Trade Paperback! The Outsider - Now Available in Trade Paperback!