Latest Movie That You Watched!

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

ghost19

"Have I run too far to get home?"
Sep 25, 2011
8,926
56,578
51
Arkansas
Finally got to watch Once Upon A Time In Hollywood

I liked it. Not QT's best film (Reservoir Dogs will always be my favorite and Pulp Fiction is everyone else's darling) but much better than most of the druck churned out by the film industry. I'd put it as slightly better than Jackie Brown and a smidge below the Kill Bill films.
"You know what they call a quarter pounder with cheese in Paris?";)
 

fljoe0

Cantre Member
Apr 5, 2008
15,859
71,642
62
120 miles S of the Pancake/Waffle line
The Frozen Ground (2013) - John Cusack and Nicolas Cage

This is a crime thriller based on real life serial killer, Robert Hansen who committed his crimes in Alaska. The movie is good and Nicolas Cage gives a hinged performance :) in this one. I read a little about Hansen after I watched the movie and figure the movie is fairly accurate about the characters but most of the police work is probably embellished to make a good thriller.
 

Wayoftheredpanda

Flaming Wonder Telepath
May 15, 2018
4,907
22,094
20
Finally got to watch Once Upon A Time In Hollywood

I liked it. Not QT's best film (Reservoir Dogs will always be my favorite and Pulp Fiction is everyone else's darling) but much better than most of the druck churned out by the film industry. I'd put it as slightly better than Jackie Brown and a smidge below the Kill Bill films.
Reservoir Dogs is also my favorite!

“Why am I Mr. Pink?”
 

Dana Jean

Dirty Pirate Hooker, The Return
Moderator
Apr 11, 2006
53,634
236,697
The High Seas
Marriage Story

Nicely done. Both Scarlet and Adam were great in this. Plus, Ray Liotta and Alan Alda were in this. I never heard a peep about them. Yes, their roles are small, but they both did a great job.

Did Laura Dern deserve this Oscar? Not sure. She did a serviceable job for the film, but not sure it was academy award winning brilliant. I would have to see the other performances to be fair about it.
 

ghost19

"Have I run too far to get home?"
Sep 25, 2011
8,926
56,578
51
Arkansas
Marriage Story

Nicely done. Both Scarlet and Adam were great in this. Plus, Ray Liotta and Alan Alda were in this. I never heard a peep about them. Yes, their roles are small, but they both did a great job.

Did Laura Dern deserve this Oscar? Not sure. She did a serviceable job for the film, but not sure it was academy award winning brilliant. I would have to see the other performances to be fair about it.
I was glad to see J. Phoenix get best actor, imho, it was one of the best movies I saw last year and Phoenix knocked it out of the park as Joker.
 

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
Watched the director's cut of Doctor Sleep this weekend. Could a great movie be even better? Indeed it can. The added footage was great and Ewan McGregor does an amazing job as Dan Torrance all grown up. As far as SK book adaptations into movies go, it's officially in my top 5.
They really did a fantastic job with Doctor Sleep. Mixing the Kubrick film with the new movie and also being able to go back to the original novel was something that shouldn't work but it does! This is one of the better King adaptions ever!
 

kingricefan

All-being, keeper of Space, Time & Dimension.
Jul 11, 2006
30,011
127,446
Spokane, WA
Marriage Story

Nicely done. Both Scarlet and Adam were great in this. Plus, Ray Liotta and Alan Alda were in this. I never heard a peep about them. Yes, their roles are small, but they both did a great job.

Did Laura Dern deserve this Oscar? Not sure. She did a serviceable job for the film, but not sure it was academy award winning brilliant. I would have to see the other performances to be fair about it.
I think Dern got it for her body of work moreso than this one role. She's always fantastic in whatever role she does. I've never seen anything where she 'phones it in'. I'm happy that she got the Oscar.
 

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
Watched 1917 by Sam Mendes. It has been so hyped that i had some expectations. I was disappointed. It is skilfully made but not original at all. Basically the same basic story as in the, IMO, better movie Gallipoli by Peter Weir. Two soldiers sent on a mission to warn some others about a danger. But where Weir captures some of the horror and senselessness of WW1 1917 paints a pretty picture but it lacks the gased and shellshocked soldiers that was told to keep on fighting, the high officers that did not much care if soldiers died. For me it paints a picture of how the war should have been that are far from how it was. It is not close to how the war was. Spielberg did a better job in Saving Private Ryan even if it had its weak points too. 3 out of 5. The direction is fine even if i think he made a wrong choice in choosing to film as if in one long shot. The effect is very skillful but also artificial and it takes you more out of the movie than into it. IMO that technique he uses works well for an opening or an ending but when used in a whole movie, as here, it is just artificial.
 

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
Saw the Oscarswinner, Parasite, by Bong Yoon Ho. There is something here, something that could have been great but stops at good. Its about a poor family that cons their way into a rich familys service. I guess you could xall it a dark comedy. It is an intelligent and interesting movie, wellacted. I think the ending could have been bettered but well worth seeing. 4 out of 5.
 

Wayoftheredpanda

Flaming Wonder Telepath
May 15, 2018
4,907
22,094
20
Watched 1917 by Sam Mendes. It has been so hyped that i had some expectations. I was disappointed. It is skilfully made but not original at all. Basically the same basic story as in the, IMO, better movie Gallipoli by Peter Weir. Two soldiers sent on a mission to warn some others about a danger. But where Weir captures some of the horror and senselessness of WW1 1917 paints a pretty picture but it lacks the gased and shellshocked soldiers that was told to keep on fighting, the high officers that did not much care if soldiers died. For me it paints a picture of how the war should have been that are far from how it was. It is not close to how the war was. Spielberg did a better job in Saving Private Ryan even if it had its weak points too. 3 out of 5. The direction is fine even if i think he made a wrong choice in choosing to film as if in one long shot. The effect is very skillful but also artificial and it takes you more out of the movie than into it. IMO that technique he uses works well for an opening or an ending but when used in a whole movie, as here, it is just artificial.
I think the point was too be a long disorienting show of incessant violence, or at least from what I've heard, I haven't seen it although it looks good. I watched SPR a long time ago and although I liked it I don't remember that much outside of the scene where they protect the little girl and Tom Hanks tries to fire the pistol at the tank
 

Wayoftheredpanda

Flaming Wonder Telepath
May 15, 2018
4,907
22,094
20
I think Dern got it for her body of work moreso than this one role. She's always fantastic in whatever role she does. I've never seen anything where she 'phones it in'. I'm happy that she got the Oscar.
Phone in leads to Oscar... something something mumbles Chaos Theory something something, I'm Jeff Goldblum and therefore I must mumble all my lines in a barely audible voice

 

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,682
65,192
59
sweden
I think the point was too be a long disorienting show of incessant violence, or at least from what I've heard, I haven't seen it although it looks good. I watched SPR a long time ago and although I liked it I don't remember that much outside of the scene where they protect the little girl and Tom Hanks tries to fire the pistol at the tank
If that was the point it fails. There is a scene where i asked myself if he is totally stupid (one of the main characters) . I dont believe a soldier that has been in the trenches for a while would act that naive. I wont say more because it might spoil it for you. As for SPR my point was that it was doing a better job of being realistic about death and dying than 1917. Its opening scene, the D-Day, looks death straight in the eye without blinking or painting a beautiful picture.. Then WW2 was a more professionally handled war than WW1. A LOT of people that without reason in WW1. Some officers actually had whole regiments walk straight into heavy machine fire without cover and lost it all. Afterward he said he didn't regret it. They died standing up as gentlemen according to him. If he hadnt given that brainless order they would have survived to fight another day and possible win. In WW2 officers had realised that men were valuable in another way. They could still be sacrificed but only if you won something for it. Time, land, political points, whatever. But something.