With all that went into o.j. Simpson story was wondering if king would ever put his spin on it. Also with the new series that came out and the documentary ( which was an incredible piece of work) wondering if u think he is guilty or innocent.
With that trial which took forever and all the witnesses that testified, the lapd, furman, the proof of the planted socks, the blood at bundy, ect,ect. Basically it comes down to 2 pieces of evidence. For innocent, the couple who were on there first date walked by the scene and testified that saw nothing and no bloody paw prints from the dog. Which were all over the side walk. That blows up the time line and proves he couldn't have done it. On the other side is the blood evidence at the scene. The only other person that would go along with that DNA was Simpsons son. Strange to that he was a chef and earlier had a knife to his girlfriends throat. I think it was his girlfriend. Might have been someone else like his boss or something.
Do u guys and gals think he did it, didn't do it, son did it or someone else. Also I doubt king would do a fictional book on it bc of the sensitivity but he might do his own version of the events. His story telling would make it tops than all the other books written about it that has a lot of bias in it bc of the agenda of the author
With that trial which took forever and all the witnesses that testified, the lapd, furman, the proof of the planted socks, the blood at bundy, ect,ect. Basically it comes down to 2 pieces of evidence. For innocent, the couple who were on there first date walked by the scene and testified that saw nothing and no bloody paw prints from the dog. Which were all over the side walk. That blows up the time line and proves he couldn't have done it. On the other side is the blood evidence at the scene. The only other person that would go along with that DNA was Simpsons son. Strange to that he was a chef and earlier had a knife to his girlfriends throat. I think it was his girlfriend. Might have been someone else like his boss or something.
Do u guys and gals think he did it, didn't do it, son did it or someone else. Also I doubt king would do a fictional book on it bc of the sensitivity but he might do his own version of the events. His story telling would make it tops than all the other books written about it that has a lot of bias in it bc of the agenda of the author