1. New to the board or trying to figure out how something works here? Check out the User Guide.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hot Topics is open from 8:30 AM - 4 PM ET Mon - Fri.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. The message board is closed between the hours of 4pm ET Friday and 8:30am ET Monday.
    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

One Of The Best...

Discussion in 'Desperation' started by staropeace, Dec 4, 2013.

  1. staropeace

    staropeace Richard Bachman's love child

    Gosh, that erie town and the movie theatre. I loved the cozy feel of all the characters hanging out there. This is my type of story. Who felt this way?
  2. Walter Oobleck

    Walter Oobleck keeps coming back...or going, and going, and going

    Yeah...nice and cozy...save for the one thing. I enjoyed the straight-forward narrative...one thing followed another without any lengthy tangents to some character's tortured past. A few sidebars at most. There's miles and miles of mine shafts around here...so the business w/the mines was a blast. I liked the Strangers, a la Dean Koontz, feel to the story, a bunch of characters drawn together and they must make a stand, they become like family. :)
  3. Hall Monitor

    Hall Monitor All bars serve the Beam.

    I really enjoyed it as well. A classic King story: great character development, fast paced, good vs. evil. I read this before The Regulators, and I've always wondered if I read them in reverse, would I have looked at it differently based on the character behaviors in the other book. I think they were meant to be read in this order, as
    I viewed Collie with a certain level of distrust in the Regulators because of his character in Desperation
  4. nate_watkins

    nate_watkins Eternal Member

    I read them in the other order. I like The Regulators more. It seems a little more fast paced. And the desert mines seem a little creepy than an Suburban Ohio neighborhood.
  5. rudiroo

    rudiroo Well-Known Member

    What makes this so. . ?
    You get thrown into Desperation head first - no exposition, no chance to catch your breath.
    It grabs you, twists your arm behind your back and holds your head under a badass nightmare.
    (And don't get me started on supporting cast of creepy-crawlies & Wile.E.Coyote's wilder, evil brothers).
    Then you're thrown out.
    No epilogue.

    It's SK's most breathless novel.
    Maybe one day AMC will get with the programme & give it The Walking Dead treatment - I can only hope. .
  6. Moderator

    Moderator Ms. Mod Administrator

    Probably no AMC pick up for this as it's already been done as a made-for-TV movie. It's available on DVD.
  7. rudiroo

    rudiroo Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the info - didn't know about the film.
    Oh well, I can dream, can't I?
  8. blunthead

    blunthead Well-Known Member

    Desperation is my number one sK. I know why only with respect to certain aspects of it, otherwise, it being my favorite is a mystery to me, and especially since the other aspects are the main reasons. I know it came along at a time when I needed something that would jolt me, so my attachment is due to timeliness. I know this happens periodically if not frequently with readers, some of whom will be relative newbies, as was I.
    Mia Deschain and Neesy like this.
  9. Neesy

    Neesy #1 fan (Annie Wilkes cousin) 1st cousin Mom's side


    Looks like Spidey got a hold of a copy of this book too!

    (I have yet to read it and I do not own it) :a11: I took it out of the library once but returned it unread.

    So this book is on my list of "yet to obtain" but I am still looking for it at thrift stores in my area.
  10. The Nameless

    The Nameless M-O-O-N - That spells Nameless

    Niether have I, but I do own it. Play.com is a brilliant kind of online thrift store for books. I think I paid about £2.50 for my copy in excellent condition, I was ripped off - it's £1.91 now. But I don't think they ship to Canada :(
    blunthead, Mia Deschain and Neesy like this.
  11. Kurben

    Kurben The Fool on the Hill

    Yes. See what you mean. but one thing i personally never got clear is why some people that figure in both books have a very different characterization. I know that that regulators was supposed to have been written by bachman but i only got a bit confused after reading both and wondered why the big difference? I mean, it is the same persona but they act totally different. Don't understand the point. Do yopu have a clue?
    Neesy, Walter Oobleck and blunthead like this.
  12. blunthead

    blunthead Well-Known Member

    Wikipedia says the characters exist in parallel realities, which share certain elements, such as the characters, but are otherwise different.
    Neesy, Walter Oobleck and FlakeNoir like this.
  13. Kurben

    Kurben The Fool on the Hill

    Ok. thats a good opinion but wikipedia is chockfull of unsupported opinions. Is it based on anything other than a personal thought? Something like a line from SK perhaps or something else like a quote perhaps. I'm sorry to sound a bit doubtful but i have read wikipedia and knew that some entries are almost totally unsupported while others are well founded in facts. Don't know which this is. And by the way, thanks for the answer. it is the closest i have come to understand it but it leaves a few questions, doesn't it. Even if these parallell realities share some characters why do they have to be so different. It is if one person is good in reality number 1 and bad in reality number 2. Doesn't make sense. Much better then to give the character another name just because it is a totally different character. You have to be able to recognise something more than just the name otherwise the belief in the parallell realities explanation gets a crack. At least according to my humble opinion. What do you out there think? Is it me who have gone bananas over this little item or do I have a point?
    blunthead, Neesy and Walter Oobleck like this.
  14. guido tkp

    guido tkp Well-Known Member

    quite liked it...agree with rudiroo: good call, there, R...

    read 'the regulators' right after...big mistake: while i quite liked TR...i could not help but find it all, at times, confusing...

    and...just because the wiki isn't perfect, doesn't mean they are always wrong, either: if'n i 'member right...that is pretty much the explanation i recall being hefted about...y'know...BackInnaDay
    blunthead and Neesy like this.
  15. Kurben

    Kurben The Fool on the Hill

    I know that theyr'e not always wrong. Just wondered what of the things it was this time. I got it sorted out by a quote from SK himself that someone posted me. Guess i can't help it, being raised in an academic world i like to have my sources.
    blunthead and Neesy like this.
  16. guido tkp

    guido tkp Well-Known Member

    raised in an academic world ??

    ah, yes...education...spelling, grammar 'n the like...hmmmm...i can now see that this is true, my erudite friend...so sorry to have erred, if but only on the side of caution...

    but i was amiss...you posed some querries back in good ol' #13...so, if i may...

    "why do they have to be so different...doesn't make sense...give the character another name...it is a totally different character"

    well...not so quick...maybe in some cases, yes...but not necessarily in all...

    in this case, this is a world that belongs to a particular writer and he gets to make the rules up, being fiction, as he sees fit...

    there are no laws on this sort of thing, just as there are no laws on exactly what, say, a werewolf looks like...king himself has had several different variation of just that critter...so, who knows...

    i'm not entirely sure that ever character we've ever come across in the different parrallel worlds have always had the exact same characteristics...

    besides...it keeps coming back to that ultimate caveat: this is fiction...the rules can be, and quite often are, made up as we go along...so, relax and enjoy the ride !

    "you have to be able to recognize something..."

    ah...sort of, but no, not really...

    have you ever watched star trek ? they've had quite a few parrallel stories...sometimes, there is but a shade of a semblance to the charcteristsics of the character we know and love...and that sort of thing appears throughout each of these two books, even if it is something as simple as a name...

    but just like in those classic ST episodes, it then veers wherever the authors mind decides to twist and turn...see, that is the fun of it

    look at it this way: if every roller coaster followed 'the rules' they'd all be the same...and, well...kinda boring: it's the unexpected twist that brings new joy

    again, enjoy the ride as it is...not the expecation you've created

    and lastly...you have not, if i may so boldly offer, gone bananas...strawberries, maybe...but certainly not bananas

    trust me...i know bananas...i'm intimate with bananas..............wait, that didn't sound right...is there an edit key...
  17. Kurben

    Kurben The Fool on the Hill

    May I have have the right to an opinion or is that banned in your worlds too?
    blunthead and Neesy like this.
  18. Moderator

    Moderator Ms. Mod Administrator

    You can read Stephen's words about it from this entry in the Library's Inspiration section for The Regulators. Also from the Publishers Weekly interview he did for their August 5, 1996 issue, he said "When I put on my Bachman hat, I feel everyone just starts at 'Go' and there's no guarantee of a happy ending....It's tremendously liberating; Bachman doesn't have a conscience, he's not afraid to say things that I may be afraid to."
  19. AchtungBaby

    AchtungBaby Well-Known Member

    Not a personal fave, but glad to see so much love for it. :)
    Doc Creed, blunthead and Neesy like this.
  20. Kurben

    Kurben The Fool on the Hill

    Thanks. Didn't get much of an explanation in the version that we got in sweden. So of course you got a bit confused. But i get the idea. Still don't think it is a really good idea, though. ;-D

Share This Page

Sleeping Beauties - Available Now