Shame on Stephen King...

  • New to the board or trying to figure out how something works here? Check out the User Guide.
  • New 2019 Hours: The message board is closed between the hours of 4pm ET Thursday and 8:30am ET Tuesday.

    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

Arcadevere

Gentle Lady From Brady Hartsfield Defense Squad
Mar 3, 2016
793
3,685
Manila, Philippines
steamcommunity.com
Except this new film version of 'It'. I was really impressed by how well it was done. I did not like the tv mini series. As far as other film adaptations, Pet Semetery was probably the closest that Hollywood came to matching the book. In the movie version of 'Cujo'
the boy was saved at the end.....in the book he dies minutes before his father showed up.
I was so glad that I had read all of his books before I saw the movies. The only drawback to that is that those of us that read the books first usually think the film adaptations aren't so good. My best friend will talk about how awesome those movies are but she's never even had a book in her hand that wasn't forced there....lol.
true, actually, i was really impress to the new IT adaptation (i watched it with my friend) because it was scary for me (and for him, my friend)
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNTLGNT and Nomik

Nomik

Carry on
Jun 19, 2016
4,068
22,406
42
Derry, NH
for selling out to Hollywood. I suspect that the high ratings from this series are from those viewers who did not read the book. This bullcrap series bastardizes the story. :m_steam:
I'm not sure which series you are referring to,(on second look I see the you are in the 11/22/63 thread, shame on my stupidity....I didn't finish watching it, but I didn't think it was terrible) but Stephen King has every right to allow adaptations to be made. As far as I know, he retains large percentage of creative control over his adaptations. He has been known to say even he isn't crazy about how some have turned out, but the fact is, some people do not read. Stephen King is a creative genius (in my not-so-humble opinion), and the world has a right to see his creations come to life on screen! Visual media is an an important medium for art in today's culture. Books are great, but the amount of work that goes into an adaptation is staggering, and is art in its own right. Some miss the mark, but others invite a whole new audience into the universe we love so much.
Writers like Diana Gabaldon, who hold out for the perfect cast, writers, directors, and network to do their books justice deserve a lot of respect too. These authors are able to reach a much wider audience via television and film.
......and have you taken notice of the box office juggernaut that IT has become?
I get a little defensive when someone shames my favorite author, sorry.
 
Last edited:

JMR

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2017
296
1,703
39
Sometimes it comes out good and sometimes well it makes you wonder why it turn out that way. But I find if you don't like a movie our show don't watch it. But if you know someone that like show or movie and you like the book better then turn them on to the book. Not all his stuff turn out bad on tv or movie. I always found it has way to get to new people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNTLGNT and Nomik

Kurben

The Fool on the Hill
Apr 12, 2014
9,013
59,871
54
sweden
How silly! Why would Sk be ashamed for what TV and moviemakers make of his books? What he is great at is writng books
so he writes books. When he sells the rights it is not in his hands anymore. Of course he could make the contract different so he had to approve every little detail in the visualizing of the book. When would he then find time to write new books? The Books are there, they dont change. They will always be great. If you dont like the tvseries or movie, dont watch them.
 
The Institute - Coming September 10th, 2019 IT - Now Available in Trade Paperback! Flight or Fright - Now Available in Trade Paperback! The Outsider - Now Available in Trade Paperback!