Coronavirus

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Status
Not open for further replies.

hollis517

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2020
50
208
70
Even Steve himself said recently: I never wan't to live in one of my books.
Who WOULD? Mr. King’s books are for rubberneckers, not for settlers. If I want to settle in a writer’s books, I’d pick Clifford D. Simak’s shorter fiction, these 4 stories in particular: The Big Front Yard, Desertion, Immigrant, and New Folks’ Home.
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
I want everyone to be tested for COVID-19 because there are at least 2 good reasons for it:

(1) Some of us may be asymptomatic carriers. This can put others at risk. It could also be of use to those studying this coronavirus.

(2) Some of us may have already had this coronavirus, with symptoms so mild that they may have been unaware of it. In that case, there may be antibodies in their blood that could be used to inoculate others against the disease as well as to assist those working on a vaccine.

For both those reasons, I believe EVERYONE should be tested. ASAP.
I agree completely and hopefully they'll start producing tests in numbers that would make it feasible to do that. We're learning on nearly a daily basis that the risks for infection and how it is transmitted are not what they first thought. It's looking like finding out you are positive even before you are symptomatic could help tremendously in preventing, or at least minimizing, the chance of a super-spreading event especially in places that have not already put stay at home mandates in effect.
 

Edward John

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2019
4,004
18,785
24
Well, they are at it again everyone.

 

hollis517

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2020
50
208
70
I agree completely and hopefully they'll start producing tests in numbers that would make it feasible to do that. We're learning on nearly a daily basis that the risks for infection and how it is transmitted are not what they first thought. It's looking like finding out you are positive even before you are symptomatic could help tremendously in preventing, or at least minimizing, the chance of a super-spreading event especially in places that have not already put stay at home mandates in effect.
That we’re learning about this virus in particular and about Science in general are two of the shiniest silver linings imaginable. That’s some of what gets me so excited these days. I want to help compile a COVID-19 Silver Linings Playbook.

My childhood heroes were (and still are) George Washington Carver and Marie Curie. I hope this pandemic can stimulate an interest in Science and in scientists, the REAL superheroes of the world, as well as spark our critical thinking abilities, these days so often not absent but dormant.
 

wolfphoenix

She-Wolf finally Risen and Strapping On.
Apr 24, 2019
2,919
17,451
57
I want everyone to be tested for COVID-19 because there are at least 2 good reasons for it:

(1) Some of us may be asymptomatic carriers. This can put others at risk. It could also be of use to those studying this coronavirus.

(2) Some of us may have already had this coronavirus, with symptoms so mild that they may have been unaware of it. In that case, there may be antibodies in their blood that could be used to inoculate others against the disease as well as to assist those working on a vaccine.

For both those reasons, I believe EVERYONE should be tested. ASAP.
In Dallas we have had two major locations set up testing, both are outdoors and are tent set ups.
They're there for those who have actual symptoms.
I think it would be impractical for everyone to be tested.
Think about the throngs of people gathering together at places like that, or outside clinics or hospitals.
Those who really have the virus or are carriers would spread it too the healthy like wildfire.
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
In Dallas we have had two major locations set up testing, both are outdoors and are tent set ups.
They're there for those who have actual symptoms.
I think it would be impractical for everyone to be tested.
Think about the throngs of people gathering together at places like that, or outside clinics or hospitals.
Those who really have the virus or are carriers would spread it too the healthy like wildfire.
Appointments. It's a thing. :)

The possible other downside, though, is that you could be tested negative but if you're not truly practicing social distancing, you could get infected later so how many times do you test? Until you get it? Until the curve has truly flattened out? Would people get a false sense of security after stay in place measures have been lifted? Lots of unknowns right now but benefits of testing are there.
 

Spideyman

Uber Member
Jul 10, 2006
46,336
195,472
79
Just north of Duma Key
Appointments. It's a thing. :)

The possible other downside, though, is that you could be tested negative but if you're not truly practicing social distancing, you could get infected later so how many times do you test? Until you get it? Until the curve has truly flattened out? Would people get a false sense of security after stay in place measures have been lifted? Lots of unknowns right now but benefits of testing are there.
thinking future "planning" -- at home tests mailed out. Sent back just like some home screening tests. If a Census can be mailed to each address, so could a test kit.
Agree about negative at time of test, and then possibility of getting infected and becoming a positive. Also false negatives.
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
Well, they are at it again everyone.

Let's be real. Every place that isn't testing everyone is not reporting actual numbers. The experts know that. I'm not saying that China hasn't been intentionally misrepresenting it as that's their usual MO about everything and we all know that. But if what we're really worried about is how widespread it is, no one really knows because there are so many people out there who are positive but haven't, and may never, be tested to confirm. Or for that matter, who may have died as a result of COVID but that didn't get reported and cause of death was attributed to something else because the medial personnel weren't looking/testing for it.
 

Edward John

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2019
4,004
18,785
24
Appointments. It's a thing. :)

The possible other downside, though, is that you could be tested negative but if you're not truly practicing social distancing, you could get infected later so how many times do you test? Until you get it? Until the curve has truly flattened out? Would people get a false sense of security after stay in place measures have been lifted? Lots of unknowns right now but benefits of testing are there.
As many have said already. One of the biggest issues which makes this virus unmanageable is the fact that you can be infected for the initial period, but not have the symptoms, but still infect others. So for the initial infection period you can spread the virus without even knowing you have it.
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
As many have said already. One of the biggest issues which makes this virus unmanageable is the fact that you can be infected for the initial period, but not have the symptoms, but still infect others. So for the initial infection period you can spread the virus without even knowing you have it.
Exactly. That's why I'm in the camp of having everyone tested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.