Doesn't hold up to repeated viewing

  • New to the board or trying to figure out how something works here? Check out the User Guide.
  • The message board will be closed:
    From 4pm ET Monday, October 1st to 8:30am ET Thursday, October 18th.
    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

  • The message board is closed between the hours of 4pm ET Friday and 8:30am ET Monday.

    As always, the Board will be open to read and those who have those privileges can still send private messages and post to Profiles.

preciousroy

Well-Known Member
Apr 4, 2018
87
305
#62
I was very excited to see a modern adaptation of IT but I have to agree that it didn't hold up. I know the screenplay went through development hell and I believe that may account for some of the disjointed experience I had watching the movie.

I hestitate to use specific examples because I don't want to commit spoilery but the movie felt like its voice kept jumping around from kid to kid instead of being about the group. There was terrible thematic dialog that never came back to have any meaning.

There were scenario additions that were unnecessary. Even the choice of era-appropriate music seemed on par with middle school writing. Watching the scene in the bathroom I felt like I could almost guarantee whoever wrote it chose the song for the number 6 and wrote around it.

The kiss was kinda creepy and didn't work outside of Hollywood cliche. Most of all, man was I disappointed with what they did with Patrick Hockstetter. I remember following the IT 2017 forum posts on imdb before the purge and Patrick Hockstetter being included in the casting was all the rage. It was a travesty what they did to him in the movie and a giant waste. What was even the point?

I have been forced to ask myself what was so great about the miniseries that makes me prefer it still. It clearly had its flaws and was heavy on cheese and it too had unnecessarily added scenes. Is it perhaps because of who I was when I first saw it and where I was in life that the miniseries impacted me much more than the modern adaptation? Maybe, so.

I would like to add that I felt like the kids did a great job playing the characters in the new adaptation and I did enjoy their chemistry on-screen. I also loved the new Pennywise and feel like he wasn't utilized to his full potential.
 

Gerald

Well-Known Member
Sep 8, 2011
1,490
4,451
The Netherlands
#63
How come when all the boys are going to dive into the river off the ledge, they all are wearing white underpants?
It was a pretty minor thing but I noticed this too, it was a bit strange. The underwear also looks kind of old fashioned, if I remember correct, older than the eighties. But I decided it was just a small town and they probably didn't have a lot of choice in the store.
 

Doc Creed

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2015
15,553
70,838
41
United States
#65
And I was just sharing a fun fact. I didn't even notice Georgie's drool. ;-D
:rofl:

This whole thread is cracking me up. I don't understand what the OP means by "doesn't hold up". I've heard that phrase when someone talks about viewing a movie they originally saw thirty years ago but not a brand new movie.
 

Rockym

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2012
70
212
#70
I kind of agree with the OP. I saw the movie when it first came out in theaters and thought it was a very good movie but a really lousy adaptation. The kids acted well in it, but they weren't much like how the kids were in the book. For one thing, Bev didn't have a reputation of being slutty and she certainly didn't act that way in the book. I think maybe the change in time period setting and aging the kids a couple of years really changed the story too much and hurt it more than helped.

In hindsight, and now having just finished another reread of the book, I'd even say the 90s miniseries was a far better adaptation of the story than the 2017 movie. Tim Curry was a much better Pennywise than Bill Skarsgård. Curry's Pennywise was taunting and wisecracking like Pennywise in the book while Skarsgård's was just talking and acting creepy most of the time.
 

Marty Coslaw

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2018
48
189
32
DC
#73
I respect your opinion even through it's wrong..:a11:
But they literally float. And it's not the 1980s or the 1960s. And to defeat the interdimensional being the 7 children just have to hit him with construction yard debris? I wanted to love this so much, and for attracting new King fans I guess I do, but that's about all.
 

Shoesalesman

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2010
1,809
4,046
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
#80
The score is great and fits the mood.
The musical score is the best thing about this movie. It's woeful, gripping, relentless and tender. Within two minutes of the film, the music had overshadowed everything else. I rarely watch a flick for the soundtrack, but this was one of those times.
 
We’ve created a Stephen King Library action for the 
			  Google Assistant and skill for Amazon Alexa. It'll give 
			  you a personalized reading recommendations based on your 
			  answers to a series of questions—so what are you waiting 
			  for? Find out which Stephen King book you should read 
			  next! Castle Rock - Wednesdays on Hulu The second season of Mr. Mercedes premieres at 10pm on August 22nd, only on Audience.