Shaky cam is well-known, and there are plenty of people who loathe it as much as I do. Fast cutting, on the other hand, does not come in for the same amount of criticism, and yet I feel that it is just as harmful towards a film as any amount of handheld shaky camerawork. In watching the old Bonds (and any film made before 2000 or so), shots were established and then held for a reasonable amount of time before the director felt the need to flick to a different angle. Nowadays the camera flips back and forth between multiple viewpoints every second or two, even when there is absolutely no need to do so. Personally, I have always felt that the old rule of "less is more" applies very well to writing, filmmaking, music, or any artwork.
Stillness and
silence draw the viewer in and build up incredible tension.
To get back to the original subject - the old Bonds feel like well-constructed classics, and watching them back-to-back with the new ones really shows up the inadequacy of modern directorial trends. Jumpy cameras, held by people with the shakes... Is anyone else annoyed by these things, or am I just showing my age?