Great! Now I'll be sing this all day! Bom, bom, bom!Blonde Bombshell:
View attachment 14619
This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
Great! Now I'll be sing this all day! Bom, bom, bom!Blonde Bombshell:
View attachment 14619
....and the Oscar for Best Actor goes to.....Yes, exactly. I remember guffawing when I saw him act like the glove wouldn't fit. Really?! Unbelievable.
I hear you pat,i forgot a lot of the details of the case,I only read one book about it,I think it was van atters',one of the lead detectives..a lot sounded like justification,or trying to explain what they did,after the fact.I think they would be right to check his house after discovering a bloody mess like that at her house,to make sure some nut wasn't after him and the family,but once they got into his estate and confirmed he wasn't there,they should have gotten a search warrant for the property based on the blood in and on his vehicle,and that he fled..the sock,I forgot,but wounds like those poor people suffered are gushers,and he may well have soaked it,and dropped it there as he changed..I just don't see a cop,even though he is admittedly a jerk,having the foresight or especially the motive to scoop up some of their blood,soak one of his socks and pin it on him,for chrissakes they had his footprints and blood from his cut leading away..Except the sock wasn't his blood, and it wasn't wiped, it was like you layed a sock on a floor and put a dollop of blood on it and let it soak through, the top layer with the bigger splotch, then it got smaller on the next, then even smaller onto the carpet.
And I believe the prosecution thought they were presenting real evidence, but that was bogus evidence it's my opinion.
He wasn't framed for double homicide, but detective Furhman(sp?), a bad man, again my opinion, or whomever(s), was well on the way making it look like it, again again, that's just my opinion...and I gotta just reckon the jury's, evidencley.
Well my Sunday vacation's over, back to some busy beein', got stuff to build, stuff to do it with, and a feeble attempt to movietize it at least some if it to attempt...Spielberg no worries, I mean don't quit your day job just yet
Oh yeah, and a litter box to clean...hey Spielberg, how you on scoopin's them poopin's
The signifcant amount of blood on the sock, in order for it to soak through in the uniformally roundish pattern they displayed, could not have just remained on his leg in a pristeen upright liquid state until he finally got home ran upstairs and whipped his socks off on the rug, least my arterial blood never has,...should have ran some that amount is what I'm sayin', and one would think it'd be smeared, but then he mighta been wearing shorts when he butchered them I suppose, and who knows that but him.I hear you pat,i forgot a lot of the details of the case,I only read one book about it,I think it was van atters',one of the lead detectives..a lot sounded like justification,or trying to explain what they did,after the fact.I think they would be right to check his house after discovering a bloody mess like that at her house,to make sure some nut wasn't after him and the family,but once they got into his estate and confirmed he wasn't there,they should have gotten a search warrant for the property based on the blood in and on his vehicle,and that he fled..the sock,I forgot,but wounds like those poor people suffered are gushers,and he may well have soaked it,and dropped it there as he changed..I just don't see a cop,even though he is admittedly a jerk,having the foresight or especially the motive to scoop up some of their blood,soak one of his socks and pin it on him,for chrissakes they had his footprints and blood from his cut leading away..
Oh that was unbridled rage.haha Pat,this is turning into the most interesting discussion of the week..needs its own properties of blood thread!
well,needless to say,arterial and venous blood can have different qualities and colorations depending on the distance it has traveled from the heart chambers,some arterial can be bright and frothy like,and some custardy..of course OJ's shoes and pants and other clothes weren't recovered,so we don't know what kind of soaking factors they may have played there either,but regardless,this is exactly what the defense wanted to do..to get people speculating,you know I had a blood wound once,and mine didn't do that! meanwhile,it was incontrovertible that his shoe prints and and droplets of his own blood were leading away from the scene..and let me tell you,that was a crime of rage,not some guy ripping them off for whatever was in their wallets..
Pretty terrific Pat! Once one turns one's head just right that is.Yeah now it's square(ish)...what, so ya gotta look at it right...'k, juuuust right, happy now?
Are you including a book for Dean to sign? And a self-addressed pre-paid postage envelope in which said book will be mailed back in?...Ok, letter is done and ready to be picked up by the handy dandy postman tomorrow.....fingers crossed....
....the address I am using is for "donations", and I scripted my request for a book and an LOA.....it specifically stated to not send items.....Are you including a book for Dean to sign? And a self-addressed pre-paid postage envelope in which said book will be mailed back in?
Oh, okay. I didn't know that there was a specific place for 'donations'. I hope Dean will do something cool then.....the address I am using is for "donations", and I scripted my request for a book and an LOA.....it specifically stated to not send items.....
....as long as it's not a bougainvillea bouquet....Oh, okay. I didn't know that there was a specific place for 'donations'. I hope Dean will do something cool then.
....as long as it's not a bougainvillea bouquet....