In The News

  • This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.

Neesy

#1 fan (Annie Wilkes cousin) 1st cousin Mom's side
May 24, 2012
61,289
239,271
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

I was a little surprised to see that the whale vomit was used for perfume.

ambergris - doesn't that sound so much nicer than vomit?

attachment.php


Weirdly enough this picture doesn't even mention ambergris

120829-coslog-ambergris-1p.jpg


Seems that it comes from the sperm whale.
 

fljoe0

Cantre Member
Apr 5, 2008
15,859
71,642
62
120 miles S of the Pancake/Waffle line
I've read a few articles about this sordid Dennis Hastert story and I'm curious as to what it was that got Dennis Hastert in trouble. I know what he allegedly did as a wrestling coach but that's not what he got in trouble for. His crime seems to be structuring bank transactions so that he would not have to report them. I've not heard an explanation as to what that actually means. Were these cash transactions greater than $10,000 or was he writing checks? He paid the victim 1.7 million dollars in hush money over a few years. Now I see the victim is suing him for the other 1.8 million he says that Hasert owes him.

Dennis Hastert accuser sues for $1.8 million - CNNPolitics.com

Now this makes me wonder if suing Dennis Hastert is the wisest move at this point for the victim. I'm sure this high profile lawsuit will make the IRS wonder if the victim reported the 1.7 million he already received from Hastert. (I'm kind of thinking no)

Anyway, can anyone tell me what Hastert actually did that brought this house of cards down.
 

Dana Jean

Dirty Pirate Hooker, The Return
Moderator
Apr 11, 2006
53,634
236,697
The High Seas
I've read a few articles about this sordid Dennis Hastert story and I'm curious as to what it was that got Dennis Hastert in trouble. I know what he allegedly did as a wrestling coach but that's not what he got in trouble for. His crime seems to be structuring bank transactions so that he would not have to report them. I've not heard an explanation as to what that actually means. Were these cash transactions greater than $10,000 or was he writing checks? He paid the victim 1.7 million dollars in hush money over a few years. Now I see the victim is suing him for the other 1.8 million he says that Hasert owes him.

Dennis Hastert accuser sues for $1.8 million - CNNPolitics.com

Now this makes me wonder if suing Dennis Hastert is the wisest move at this point for the victim. I'm sure this high profile lawsuit will make the IRS wonder if the victim reported the 1.7 million he already received from Hastert. (I'm kind of thinking no)

Anyway, can anyone tell me what Hastert actually did that brought this house of cards down.
I think the person suing him is doing so for sexual molesting them.
 

fljoe0

Cantre Member
Apr 5, 2008
15,859
71,642
62
120 miles S of the Pancake/Waffle line
I think the person suing him is doing so for sexual molesting them.

Yes, that's what the lawsuit is but that's not what got Hastert in trouble. I was wondering if anyone knows what it was that Hastert did that triggered this investigation in the first place. The victim(s) never came forward until after this investigation started.

Or maybe I should say, what does structuring bank transactions mean, exactly?
 
Last edited:

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
I've read a few articles about this sordid Dennis Hastert story and I'm curious as to what it was that got Dennis Hastert in trouble. I know what he allegedly did as a wrestling coach but that's not what he got in trouble for. His crime seems to be structuring bank transactions so that he would not have to report them. I've not heard an explanation as to what that actually means. Were these cash transactions greater than $10,000 or was he writing checks? He paid the victim 1.7 million dollars in hush money over a few years. Now I see the victim is suing him for the other 1.8 million he says that Hasert owes him.

Dennis Hastert accuser sues for $1.8 million - CNNPolitics.com

Now this makes me wonder if suing Dennis Hastert is the wisest move at this point for the victim. I'm sure this high profile lawsuit will make the IRS wonder if the victim reported the 1.7 million he already received from Hastert. (I'm kind of thinking no)

Anyway, can anyone tell me what Hastert actually did that brought this house of cards down.

He made multiple payments withdrawals above the $10,000 and his bank questioned it. He then switched to taking out less than $10,000 from different accounts but I couldn't find out what tipped off the Feds.

[Edit: speculation is that it was the bank that tipped them off]
 
Last edited:

fljoe0

Cantre Member
Apr 5, 2008
15,859
71,642
62
120 miles S of the Pancake/Waffle line
He made multiple payments above the $10,000 and his bank questioned it. He then switched to taking out less than $10,000 from different accounts but I couldn't find out what tipped off the Feds.

[Edit: speculation is that it was the bank that tipped them off]

I'm not exactly sure what the law is on the $10,000 cash transaction. I only thought it applied if you were making $10,000 deposits. I thought you could take your own money out how ever you want. But maybe not.


Maybe the victim needs the 1.8 million now to pay his taxes and penalties on the previous 1.7 million.

I always wonder about these hush money cases and the tax fallout from them. When you admit you were taking hush money, I'm sure that raises some red flags at the IRS.
 

Moderator

Ms. Mod
Administrator
Jul 10, 2006
52,243
157,324
Maine
I'm not exactly what the law is on the $10,000 cash transaction. I only thought it applied if you were making $10,000 deposits. I thought you could take your own money out how ever you want. But maybe not.


Maybe the victim needs the 1.8 million now to pay his taxes and penalties on the previous 1.7 million.

I always wonder about these hush money cases and the tax fallout from them. When you admit you were taking hush money, I'm sure that raises some red flags at the IRS.
No, it's the withdrawals as well that flag accounts. Anything over $10,000 will be questioned.